US Supreme Court Orders



(ORDER LIST: 530 U.S.)MONDAY, JUNE 26, 2000
 CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION
 99-935    CHANDLER, MICHAEL, ETC. V. SIEGELMAN, GOV. OF AL ET AL.                   
 The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.              
 The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit              for further consideration in light of Santa Fe             
  Independent School District v. Doe, 530 U.S. ___ (2000).99-1264   

 BROWN, JAMES H. V. O'DEA, WARDEN                   
 The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Terry Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. ___ (2000).
 ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
 99M94     BYRD, HARLEY A. V. SALMON, STEVE                   
 The motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out-of-time is denied.108, ORIG. NEBRASKA V. WYOMING, ET AL. The motion of the Special Master for comnpensation and reimbursement of expenses is granted, and the Special Master is awarded a total of $90,755.32 for the period December 2, 1999 through June 5, 2000, to be paid as follows:  40% by              Nebraska, 40% by Wyoming, 3% by Colorado, 12% by the United              States, and 5% by Basin Electric Power Cooperative.99-1178   SOLID WASTE AGENCY, ETC. V. U.S. ARMY CORP. ENGINEERS                   The motion of petitioner to dispense with printing              the joint appendix is granted.99-1257   BROWNER, EPA ADMINR. V. AM. TRUCKING ASSNS., ET AL.99-1426   AM. TRUCKING ASSNS., ET AL. V. BROWNER, EPA ADMINR.                   The motion of the Solicitor General to dispense              with printing the joint appendices is granted.APPEALS -- JURISDICTION NOTED99-1864 ) HUNT, GOV. OF NC, ET AL. V. CROMARTIE, MARTIN, ET AL.        )99-1865 ) SMALLWOOD, ALFRED, ET AL. V. CROMARTIE, MARTIN, ET AL.                   In these cases probable jurisdiction is noted. The              cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is              allotted for oral argument.CERTIORARI GRANTED99-1551   SEMTEK INTL. INC. V. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP.99-1571   TrafFIX DEVICES, INC. V. MARKETING DISPLAYS, INC.                   The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.99-1408   ATWATER, GAIL, ET AL. V. LAGO VISTA, TX, ET AL.                   The motion of American Civil Liberties Union of              Texas, Inc., for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae              is granted. The motion of Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers              Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae              is granted. The motion of National Association of              Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al., for leave to file a              brief as amici curiae is granted. The petition for a              writ of certiorari is granted.99-1687 ) BARTNICKI, GLORIA, ET AL. V. VOPPER, FREDERICK W., ET AL.        )99-1728 ) UNITED STATES V. VOPPER, FREDERICK W., ET AL.                   The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.              The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is              allotted for oral argument.99-1702   TEXAS V. COBB, RAYMOND L.                   The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in              forma pauperis is granted. The motion of Criminal              Justice Legal Foundation for leave to file a brief as              amicus curiae is granted. The motion of National              Association of Police Organizations, et al., for leave              to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The motion              of Texas District & County Attorneys Association, et              al., for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is              granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is              granted limited to Questions 1 and 2 presented by the              petition.99-1792   DIR. OF REVENUE OF MO V. CoBANK ACB                   The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted              limited to the following question: "Does 12 U.S.C.              Section 2134 authorize states to tax the income of the              National Bank for Cooperatives, a federally chartered              instrumentality of the United States?".99-8576   GLOVER, PAUL L. V. UNITED STATES                   The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in              forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari              are granted.CERTIORARI DENIED99-905    ARMSTRONG SURGICAL CTR. V. ARMSTRONG CTY. MEM. HOSP.99-1349   HALE, MATTHEW F. V. ILLINOIS BAR, ET AL.99-1457   DITTMAN, ROY RICHARD V. CALIFORNIA, ET AL.99-1490 ) SOUTH DAKOTA, ET AL. V. YANKTON SIOUX TRIBE, ET AL.        )99-1683 ) YANKTON SIOUX TRIBE, ET AL. V. GAFFEY, MATT, ET AL.99-1504   NEDER, ELLIS E. V. UNITED STATES99-1556   ALCOA INC., ET AL. V. BONNEVILLE POWER ADMIN.99-1594   BUTTS, JAMES, ET AL. V. McNALLY, JAMES, ET AL.99-1623   WASHINGTON, BERNITA, ET AL. vs. CSC CREDIT SVCS., ET AL.99-1677   MYSTIC TRANSP., INC., ET AL. V. CARLTON, CHARLES99-1704   INTER-MODAL RAIL EMPLOY. V. BURLINGTON N., ET AL.99-1706   SULLIVAN, RICHARD V. RIVER VALLEY SCH. DIST.99-1708   HILLCREST DEV. V. RIVERSIDE, CA, ET AL.99-1710   UTAH V. CANNON, LINDA99-1711   CUCAMONGANS UNITED, ET AL. V. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ET AL.99-1715   SOPER, RENEE, ETC., ET AL. V. HOBEN, CHRISTINE, ET AL.99-1716   BIBBEE, JAMES R. V. SCOTT, WARDEN99-1742   BARRETT, JOHN, ET UX. vs. HARWOOD, MARY, ET AL.99-1743   BUCKLEY, PATRICK V. PORTAGE, MI, ET AL.99-1744   FLORIDA V. CONNER, DAVID R.99-1752   SPORTY'S FARM, L. L. C. vs. SPORTSMAN'S MARKET, INC.99-1753   SEWELL, DARYL K. V. MICHIGAN99-1754   KAHN, LEONARD R. V. GENERAL MOTORS CORP.99-1761   NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS V. PARNELL, ANGELA, ETC., ET AL99-1764   CERVONE, DAVID P. V. BORIS, CHARLES L.99-1767   CASKEY, MARVIN J. V. PENSION BENEFIT CORP.99-1771   KAHRE, ROBERT vs. U. S. FIDELITY & GUARANTY CO99-1773   MEYER, TANYA V. MEYER, RONALD ALLEN99-1779   WEE, JOHN C., ET UX. vs. ANDREWS, JOHN, ET AL.99-1781   PIETRANGELO, JAMES E. V. UNITED STATES SENATE99-1793   BOWEN, JULIE A., ET AL. vs. BD. OF PATENT APPEALS99-1803   McDUFFIE, ERNEST, ETC. V. UNITED STATES99-1810   MARTIN, MICHAEL R. V. UNITED STATES99-1830   MOBIL OIL CORP., ET AL. V. McMAHON FOUNDATION, ET AL.99-1837   ANDERSON, WILLIAM R., ET UX. vs. CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT COMM.99-1846   GOULD, THEODORE B. V. UNITED STATES99-1866   INFELISE, ROCCO E. V. UNITED STATES99-1868   FRIES, LEO vs. WI CT. OF APP., ET AL.99-1873   LODD ENTERPRISES, ET AL. V. COASTAL FORD, INC., ET AL.99-1885   STROGOV, EMILIA V. NEW YORK99-1888   INTL. CUSTOMS ASSOCS., ET AL V. FORD MOTOR CO., ET AL.99-1895   DeVEGTER, MICHAEL V. UNITED STATES99-1905   EL-FADLY, ABD EL-HAMID A. vs. IRS99-6865   CAGLE, WILBURN G., ET AL. vs. HUTTO, T. D., ET AL.99-7367   VAZQUEZ, RANDOLPH C., ET AL. V. CARVER, TIMOTHY, ET AL.99-8312   TUCKER, ORVILLE V. UNITED STATES99-8585   COLLADO, JUAN V. UNITED STATES99-8837   SHEHEE, KEVIN L. V. LUTTRELL, MARK H., ET AL.99-8842   DELEVEAUX, JAMES V. vs. UNITED STATES99-9164   SMITH, RICHARD D. V. HARGETT, WARDEN99-9170   ORTIZ, ANDRES H. V. MOORE, SEC., FL DOC99-9171   SHEA, ROBERT V. vs. VERMONT99-9191   PORTER, PAUL V. POTOCKI, TERESA99-9195   LUKEN, RICHARD V. CALIFORNIA99-9198   OWENS, LAMONT E. V. DORMIRE, SUPT., JEFFERSON99-9199   TIMMONS, WILLIE J. V. KEMNA, MICHAEL, ET AL.99-9205   NASH, DAVID L. V. BATTLE, WARDEN, ET AL.99-9206   THOMPSON, MATTHEW V. OKLAHOMA99-9208   ODOM, CHRISTOPHER V. COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON99-9213   AGUIRRE, ARMANDO V. CLARKE, WARDEN, ET AL.99-9217   LITTERAL, JAMES C. V. WILLIAMS, WARDEN, ET AL.99-9221   KING, SHERRY T. V. BOYD, JAMES, ET AL.99-9223   MELONCON, PHILLIP C. V. GODINICH, JEROME99-9225   MARTIN, THOMAS A. V. EHRLICH, MARC S.99-9227   ODOM, CHRISTOPHER V. SOUTH CAROLINA, ET AL.99-9228   SPULKA, KENNETH V. WALKER, SUPT., AUBURN99-9231   BOITNOTT, JERALD W. V. CRIST, WARDEN99-9233   ATHERTON, PETER J. V. SNYDER, ARTHUR E., ET AL.99-9234   CUDNOHOSKY, BERNIE V. CIRCUIT COURT OF WI, ET AL.99-9235   ALDAZABAL, JOSE V. MORGAN, WARDEN99-9236   BAEZ, ROBERTO V. FOLES, CHIEF DEPUTY SHERIFF99-9251   HARRISON, WILLIE V. CAIN, WARDEN99-9252   DUBUC, BRIAN D. V. JOHNSON, SATAYABAMA, ET AL.99-9253   DANIEL, STEVEN E. V. PAPERBACK SWAP-N-SHOP99-9255   GIBSON, RUFUS V. NEW YORK CITY, ET AL.99-9259   SMITH, JAMES R. V. CALIFORNIA99-9263   CHEATHAM, CHARLES L. V. WARD, WARDEN99-9265   BURNETT, CARL V. GREEN, MELODY99-9273   THAMES, BRIAN F. V. WHITE, WARDEN, ET AL.99-9274   TAYLOR, THADDEUS V. CT BD. OF MEDIATION, ETC.99-9296   ROBERTS, GEORGE W. T. vs. MOORE, SEC., FL DOC99-9317   RICHARDSON-LONGMIRE, CHRIS V. KANSAS99-9321   MORGAN, WALTER D. V. NV BOARD OF PRISON COMMRS.99-9362   PROPER, JOEY S. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ99-9433   KHASHOGGI, SHAIKH SHI'TE T. vs. MOORE, SEC., FL DOC, ET AL.99-9487   ORYANG, BENJAMIN B. V. MITCHEM, WARDEN, ET AL.99-9488   REDMOND, RANDELL J. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ99-9489   RICHARDSON, WILLIAM L. V. WEST VIRGINIA99-9506   MATHIS, VERNON D. V. HENDERSON, POSTMASTER GEN.99-9565   JOHNSON, HAYES V. WISCONSIN99-9566 ) JACKSON, AUTUMN V. UNITED STATES        )99-9693 ) MEDINA, JOSE V. UNITED STATES99-9568   LOWRY, VINCENT P. V. DEPT. OF DEFENSE99-9578   TORRECH-GONZALEZ, JOSE V. UNITED STATES99-9588   HERNANDEZ-GARCIA, GIOVANY V. UNITED STATES99-9594   ERVIN, TOMAS G. V. LUEBBERS, SUPT., POTOSI99-9606   UPSHER, ROBERT L. V. UNITED STATES ARMY99-9616 ) ROBINSON, JOHN V. UNITED STATES        )99-9672 ) WARREN, JOHN W. V. UNITED STATES99-9620   KELLY, JOSEPH V. UNITED STATES99-9640   YEPEZ, JOSE W. V. UNITED STATES99-9653   HOGAN, ERIC V. UNITED STATES99-9656   HILL, CHRISTOPHER B. V. UNITED STATES99-9658   ANIEKWU, ANTHONY C. V. UNITED STATES99-9660   DAVID, ANTHONY D. V. UNITED STATES99-9662   GUIMOND, DONALD E. V. UNITED STATES99-9663   HANKEY, LAVERN V. UNITED STATES99-9670   BELL, MICHAEL V. UNITED STATES99-9671   PRINCE, WILLIAM L. V. UNITED STATES99-9673   ZAKARIA, HOSAM M. V. UNITED STATES99-9680   PEARSON, ERIC D. V. UNITED STATES99-9685   JARRELL, BOBBY V. UNITED STATES99-9689   ISAACS, RANDY G. V. UNITED STATES99-9691   LEDESMA, LUIS C. V. UNITED STATES99-9700   BROOKS, MARCUS A. V. UNITED STATES99-9704   LIPSCOMB, DENISHHA, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES99-9711   WINTERS, GERALD V. UNITED STATES99-9714   PEARSALL, ROBERT W. V. UNITED STATES99-9716   REYNOLDS, WELDON K. V. OHIO99-9725   PENA, DOMINGO, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES99-9727   SPADE, ROBERT W. V. OHIO99-9728   FRAY, DAWN A. V. UNITED STATES99-9733   HAZEL, BOBBY E. V. UNITED STATES99-9742   HINOJOSA, EVARISTO V. PURDY, WARDEN99-9744   HUNT, SIDNEY V. UNITED STATES99-9758   BIVINS, KAREN V. UNITED STATES99-9759   COLLINS, TORY V. UNITED STATES99-9764   ALALADE, OLUSOLA A. V. UNITED STATES                   The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.99-1667   ANDERSON, MADISON V. JOHNSON, MERLL, ET AL.                   The motion of respondents Wayne County Circuit              Court, et al., for sanctions, including double costs and              attorneys fees, is denied. The petition for a writ of              certiorari is denied.99-1733   SHOPPERS FOOD WAREHOUSE V. MORENO, ASUNCION                   The motion of Chamber of Commerce of the United              States, et al., for leave to file a brief as amici curiae              is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is              denied.HABEAS CORPUS DENIED99-9772   IN RE ROBERT DEEMER                   The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.PROHIBITION DENIED99-9563   IN RE DANIEL B. JEFFS                   The petition for a writ of prohibition is denied.REHEARING DENIED99-1453   U.S., EX REL. A-1 AMBULANCE V. MONTEREY COUNTY, CA, ET AL.                   The petition for rehearing is denied.ATTORNEY DISCIPLINED-2148    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF WILLIAM T. STONE                   William T. Stone, of Williamsburg, Virginia, having              been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by              order of March 27, 2000; and a rule having been issued              and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he              should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response              having expired;                   It is ordered that William T. Stone is disbarred              from the practice of law in this Court.D-2149    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF STEPHEN L. RASKIN                   Stephen L. Raskin, of South Miami, Florida, having              been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by              order of March 27, 2000; and a rule having been issued              requiring him to show cause why he should not be              disbarred;                   It is ordered that Stephen L. Raskin is disbarred              from the practice of law in this Court.D-2150    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF N. DAVID KORONES                   N. David Korones, of St. Petersburg, Florida,              having been suspended from the practice of law in this              Court by order of March 27, 2000; and a rule having been              issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause              why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a              response having expired;                   It is ordered that N. David Korones is disbarred              from the practice of law in this Court.D-2152    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF TIMOTHY S. HALEY                   Timothy S. Haley, of Caldwell, New Jersey, having              been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by              order of March 27, 2000; and a rule having been issued              requiring him to show cause why he should not be              disbarred;                   It is ordered that Timothy S. Haley is disbarred              from the practice of law in this Court.D-2153    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF WILLIAM M. SCALF                   William M. Scalf, of Corbin, Kentucky, having been              suspended from the practice of law in this Court by              order of April 3, 2000; and a rule having been issued              requiring him to show cause why he should not be              disbarred;                   It is ordered that William M. Scalf is disbarred              from the practice of law in this Court.D-2154    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAMES LLEWELLYN ADAMS                   James Llewellyn Adams, of Breckenridge, Colorado,              having been suspended from the practice of law in this              Court by order of April 3, 2000; and a rule having been              issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause              why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a              response having expired;                                It is ordered that James Llewellyn Adams is              disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.D-2156    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF EKITA LEVERETTE MITCHELL                   Ekita Leverette Mitchell, of Silver Spring,              Maryland, having been suspended from the practice of law              in this Court by order of April 3, 2000; and a rule              having been issued requiring her to show cause why she              should not be disbarred;                   It is ordered that Ekita Leverette Mitchell is              disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.D-2159    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF GEOFFREY SCOTT BLACK                   Geoffrey Scott Black, of Hampstead, Maryland,              having been suspended from the practice of law in this              Court by order of April 24, 2000; and a rule having been              issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause              why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a              response having expired;                   It is ordered that Geoffrey Scott Black is              disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.D-2165    IN THE MATTER OF DAVID FERRIS TAMER                   David Ferris Tamer, of Winston-Salem, North              Carolina, having requested to resign as a member of the              Bar of this Court, it is ordered that his name be              stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to the              practice of law before this Court. The Rule to Show              Cause, issued on May 22, 2000, is discharged.D-2166    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DANIEL G. CARROLL                   Daniel G. Carroll, of Chicago, Illinois, is              suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a              rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring              him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from              the practice of law in this Court.D-2167    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF CHARLES H. JACOBS                   Charles H. Jacobs, of Dubuque, Iowa, is suspended              from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will              issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show              cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice              of law in this Court.D-2168    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF TREVOR L. BROOKS                   Trevor L. Brooks, of New York, New York, is              suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a              rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring              him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from              the practice of law in this Court.D-2169    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF THOMAS MICHAEL BOOKER                   Thomas Michael Booker, of Austin, Texas, is              suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a              rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring              him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from              the practice of law in this Court.D-2170    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF RICHARD DENNIS ESPER                   Richard Dennis Esper, of El Paso, Texas, is              suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a              rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring              him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from              the practice of law in this Court.D-2171    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROBET LEE BURNETT, JR.                   Robet Lee Burnett, Jr., of Beaumont, Texas, is              suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a              rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring              him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from              the practice of law in this Court.D-2172    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF RONALD SILVER                   Ronald Silver, of Coral Gables, Florida, is              suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a              rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring              him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from              the practice of law in this Court.D-2173    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF GLENN MICHAEL ROCCA                   Glenn Michael Rocca, of Fort Lee, New Jersey, is              suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a              rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring              him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from              the practice of law in this Court.D-2174    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOSEPH PAUL KIERPIEC                   Joseph Paul Kierpiec, of Detroit, Michigan, is              suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a              rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring              him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from              the practice of law in this Court.D-2175    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MARSHALL D. TANDY                   Marshall D. Tandy, of Tucson, Arizona, is suspended              from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will              issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show              cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice              of law in this Court.D-2176    IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HOWELL JACKSON GREGORY                   Howell Jackson Gregory, of Columbia, South              Carolina, is suspended from the practice of law in this              Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days,              requiring him to show cause why he should not be              disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More