{"id":50458,"date":"2016-09-30T11:27:00","date_gmt":"2016-09-30T16:27:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/content.findlaw-admin.com\/ability-legal\/supreme\/legal-commentary\/book-reviews-by-title.html"},"modified":"2016-09-30T11:27:00","modified_gmt":"2016-09-30T16:27:00","slug":"book-reviews-by-title","status":"publish","type":"supreme","link":"https:\/\/supreme.findlaw.com\/legal-commentary\/book-reviews-by-title.html","title":{"rendered":"Book Reviews By Title"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-9d6595d7  fl-block-columns fl-sectionWithSidebar fl-container fl-flex fl-flex-wrap fl-gap30\">\n    \n    <div class=\"fl-page-articles   fl-block-column fl-section-main fl-section-main-full-width\">\n        \n<!-- Right Line of Links Section -->\n<div class=\"yui-g\" id=\"leftcol-module\">\n<h1>Book Reviews<\/h1>\n\n\n<!-- FEATURED ARTICLES START HERE -->\n\n<!-- Book Review -->\n<!-- End Review -->\n<table width=\"100%\" border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\">\n  <tr>\n    <td class=\"writtdback\"><\/td>\n    <td width=\"31%\" height=\"22\" align=\"right\" class=\"writtdback\"><h4><a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/archive-index.html\" class=\"barlink\">Archive<\/a><\/h4><\/td>\n  <\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<!-- Articles Start Here -->\n  <table width=\"100%\" border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"5\" align=\"center\">\n    <tr>\n<!-- FEATURED ARTICLES START HERE -->\n      <td width=\"100%\">\n<!--#config timefmt=\"%Y%m%d\" -->\n<!--#if expr=\"(${DATE_LOCAL} <= 20080531) || (${QUERY_STRING} = findlaw99)\" -->\n        <script language=\"JavaScript\" type=\"text\/javascript\">\n        window.onload=function() {\n            var query = window.location.search.substring(1);\n            if (query == \"findlaw99\") {\n                document.getElementById(\"findlaw99\").style.display= \"block\";\n            }\n        }\n    <\/script>\n\n        <div id=\"findlaw99\" style=\"display:none\">\n\n        <table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\" align=\"left\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"top\">\n              <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https://supreme.findlaw.com/static/c/images\/image\/upload\/ability-legal\/wp-prod\/legal-commentary-images-illustrations-conservlegalmvmt.png\" alt=\"Book Review\" border=\"0\">\n            <\/td>\n            <td>\n              <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https://supreme.findlaw.com/static/f/images\/shared\/spacer.gif\" height=\"123\" width=\"5\">\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n<!-- current book review -->\n        <table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-first-amendment-guardian-of-all-freedoms.html\" class=\"wauthor\">ELAINE CASSEL<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-successes-and-failures-of-political-conservatism-in-legal-academia-and-practice.html\" class=\"wtitle\">The Successes and Failures of Political Conservatism in Legal Academia and Practice: A Review of Steve Teles&#8217;s The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer Rodger Citron discusses a recent book by visiting Yale law professor Steve Teles on political conservatism within the law.   Teles covers the rise of the highly successful Federalist Society and other, less successful conservative advocacy groups, and the advent and influence of the Law and Economics movement.   Citron discusses Teles&#8217;s work both as an historical account, and in light of what its relevance may be to the November\n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Thursday, Jun. 12, 2008<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><\/div>\n<!--#endif -->\n      <\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/table>\n\n\n<!-- END FEATURED -->\n  <table width=\"100%\" border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\">\n    <tr>\n      <td bgcolor=\"#ffffff\" height=\"1\" colspan=\"2\">\n         \n      <\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr bgcolor=\"#ffffff\">\n      \n      <td height=\"25\"><ul class=\"column-fix orange-link legal-commentarty-navigation\"><li>\u00a0<\/li><li>\n        Most Recent <a class=\"barlink\">|<\/a> <a class=\"barlink\" href=\"\/legal-commentary\/book-reviews-by-title-7.html\">Page\u00a07<\/a> <a class=\"barlink\">|<\/a> <a class=\"barlink\" href=\"\/legal-commentary\/book-reviews-by-title-6.html\">Page\u00a06<\/a> <a class=\"barlink\">|<\/a> <a class=\"barlink\" href=\"\/legal-commentary\/book-reviews-by-title-5.html\">Page\u00a05<\/a> <a class=\"barlink\">|<\/a> <a class=\"barlink\" href=\"\/legal-commentary\/book-reviews-by-title-4.html\">Page\u00a04<\/a> <a class=\"barlink\">|<\/a> <a class=\"barlink\" href=\"\/legal-commentary\/book-reviews-by-title-3.html\">Page\u00a03<\/a> <a class=\"barlink\">|<\/a> <a class=\"barlink\" href=\"\/legal-commentary\/book-reviews-by-title-2.html\">Page\u00a02<\/a> <a class=\"barlink\">|<\/a> <a class=\"barlink\" href=\"\/legal-commentary\/book-reviews-by-title-1.html\">Page\u00a01<\/a><\/li> \n      <\/ul><\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td bgcolor=\"#ffffff\" height=\"1\" colspan=\"2\">\n         \n      <\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/table>\n  <table width=\"95%\" border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"5\" cellpadding=\"5\" align=\"center\">\n    <tr valign=\"top\">\n      <td colspan=\"2\">\n<!-- BEGIN PAST REVIEWS SEGMENT -->\n\n<table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-first-amendment-guardian-of-all-freedoms.html\" class=\"wauthor\">ELAINE CASSEL<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-first-amendment-guardian-of-all-freedoms.html\" class=\"wtitle\">The First Amendment: Guardian of All Freedoms: A Review of Anthony Lewis&#8217;s Freedom for the Thought That We Hate: A Biography of the First Amendment<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer, attorney, and author Elaine Cassel weighs in on journalist Anthony Lewis&#8217;s new work on the First Amendment. As Cassel explains, while Lewis is a strong believer in First Amendment rights, he also discusses certain scenarios in which he believes the First Amendment does not apply, or applies but only in a limited way. Moreover, Lewis covers not just First Amendment law, but also the Amendment&#8217;s &#8220;life&#8221; &#8212; consisting of the stories of litigants and judges who invoked it. \n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Feb. 29, 2008<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/antitrust-attacked-a-review-of-edwin-rockefellers-new-book-on-antitrust-law.html\" class=\"wauthor\">SETH BLOOM<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/antitrust-attacked-a-review-of-edwin-rockefellers-new-book-on-antitrust-law.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Antitrust Attacked: A Review of Edwin Rockefeller&#8217;s New Book on Antitrust Law <\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and Senate Antitrust Subcommittee Senior Counsel Seth Bloom reviews Edwin Rockefeller&#8217;s new book, &#8220;The Antitrust Religion.&#8221; Bloom takes sharp issue with Rockefeller&#8217;s claim that antitrust law is so arbitrary, standardless, and highly-politicized, that it is more accurately described as religion than as law. In critiquing Rockefeller&#8217;s claims, Bloom discusses the problems that liberal and conservative economists alike agree will occur in a completely unregulated market, and contrasts the governing standards of antitrust law with those that apply in other legal areas which, he contends, are also necessarily broad and imprecise. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Thursday, Dec. 06, 2007<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-partisan-reaction-to-clarence-thomass-my-grandfathers-son-how-reviewers-have-proven-themselves-unable-to-put-politics-aside-to-provide-a-fair-assessment-of-the-justices-memoir.html\" class=\"wauthor\">SCOTT DOUGLAS GERBER<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-partisan-reaction-to-clarence-thomass-my-grandfathers-son-how-reviewers-have-proven-themselves-unable-to-put-politics-aside-to-provide-a-fair-assessment-of-the-justices-memoir.html\" class=\"wtitle\">The Partisan Reaction to Clarence Thomas&#8217;s My Grandfather&#8217;s Son: How Reviewers Have Proven Themselves Unable to Put Politics Aside to Provide a Fair Assessment of the Justice&#8217;s Memoir <\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer, Ohio Northern law professor, and author Scott Gerber discusses the critical reaction in the wake of the publication of Justice Clarence Thomas&#8217;s memoir, My Grandfather&#8217;s Son. Gerber argues that the vitriol from the Left regarding Justice Thomas&#8217;s book has been unwarranted, and contends that a more balanced view is called for. He also discusses an aspect of Justice Thomas&#8217;s qualifications that he contends the Left has consistently overlooked: Thomas&#8217;s scholarship on the Declaration of Independence, which Gerber, a scholar in the same area, esteems quite highly.\n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Tuesday, Dec. 04, 2007<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/our-busted-government-and-how-to-fix-it.html\" class=\"wauthor\">ELAINE CASSEL<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/our-busted-government-and-how-to-fix-it.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Our Busted Government and How to Fix It: A Review of John Dean&#8217;s Broken Government: How Republican Rule Destroyed the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial Branches <\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Elaine Cassel reviews the most recent book by FindLaw columnist and former counsel to the president John Dean, Broken Government: How Republican Rule Destroyed the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial Branches. Dean&#8217;s book, as Cassel explains, discusses, for example, the role of the Vice President and his attorneys; the confirmations of Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito; and the Bush White House&#8217;s use of signing statements and preference for secrecy across a number of areas. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Oct. 05, 2007<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/finding-equality-in-difference-an-excellent-new-book-considers-what-twenty-first-century-legal-feminism-should-look-like.html\" class=\"wauthor\">KIMBERLY YURACKO<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/finding-equality-in-difference-an-excellent-new-book-considers-what-twenty-first-century-legal-feminism-should-look-like.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Finding Equality in Difference: An Excellent New Book Considers What Twenty-First Century Legal Feminism Should Look Like  <\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and Northwestern law professor Kimberly Yuracko weighs in on FindLaw columnist and Rutgers law professor Sherry Colb&#8217;s recent book, &#8220;When Sex Counts: Making Babies and Making Law.&#8221; Yuracko argues that Colb&#8217;s version of feminism, as expressed in her discussions of reproductive rights and related issues, is to be highly praised &#8212; because it provides both a nuanced, insightful theoretical framework with which to analyze such issues, and also specific, real-world answers that take into account realities about incentives and how people tend to behave. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Jul. 06, 2007<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-law-professors-first-legal-thriller-hits-its-mark-a-review-of-scott-gerbers-the-law-clerk.html\" class=\"wauthor\">MARK TRESNOWSKI<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-law-professors-first-legal-thriller-hits-its-mark-a-review-of-scott-gerbers-the-law-clerk.html\" class=\"wtitle\">A Law Professor&#8217;s First Legal Thriller Hits Its Mark: A Review of Scott Gerber&#8217;s The Law Clerk <\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">Can a legal thriller effectively explore serious issues, as well as entertaining readers? FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Mark Tresnowski says the answer is a resounding yes &#8212; when the thriller is The Law Clerk. In The Law Clerk, Tresnowski explains, author Scott Gerber &#8212; a law professor at Ohio Northern and a FindLaw guest columnist &#8212; not only creates an effective, fast-paced mystery, but also, along the way, illustrates why law clerks give up their idealistic views of the law, and how pornography may be connected to abuse of, and danger for, women. Tresnowski contends that the ambition of Gerber&#8217;s novel makes it rise above other recent legal thrillers as an exceptionally interesting and rewarding read. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, May. 25, 2007<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/considering-the-intersection-of-legal-rules-and-virtual-spaces.html\" class=\"wauthor\">CECILY MAK<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/considering-the-intersection-of-legal-rules-and-virtual-spaces.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Considering the Intersection of Legal Rules and Virtual Spaces:  A Review of The Essay Collection &#8220;The State of Play: Law, Games and Virtual Worlds&#8221;<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and RealNetworks Senior Counsel Cecily Mak discusses a fascinating new essay collection on the real world, virtual worlds, and the laws of each type of space. As Mak explains, the book illuminates questions such as the extent to which real-world laws should affect virtual words (like Second Life), protecting property and other rights; whether a virtual-world designer may own the intellectual property rights to the material that arises within the world she has created, or whether the direct creators of the material do; and whether virtual worlds may prove to be fertile testing grounds for untried, innovative real world legal approaches. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Monday, Feb. 12, 2007<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/air-america-revisited.html\" class=\"wauthor\">JOANNE MARINER<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/air-america-revisited.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Air America Revisited<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw columnist and human rights attorney Joanne Mariner discusses Stephen Grey&#8217;s new book, Ghost Plane: The True Story of the CIA Torture Program. Among the practices Grey&#8217;s book reports, Mariner notes, is the practice of rendition (the U.S.&#8217;s sending a detainee to another country to be brutally tortured there outside of the law and without any shard of due process protection). Mariner explains how Grey was able to connect the patterns of CIA planes&#8217; flights to Egypt, Uzbekistan, Libya and Guantanamo to the practice of rendition. While applauding the book as excellent and well-researched, Mariner also looks to the future for another work (or an updated version of this one) that would cover secret CIA prisons, as well.\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Wednesday, Dec. 06, 2006<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-demise-of-conservatism-and-the-rise-of-authoritarianism-a-review-of-john-deans-conservatives-without-conscience.html\" class=\"wauthor\">ELAINE CASSEL<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-demise-of-conservatism-and-the-rise-of-authoritarianism-a-review-of-john-deans-conservatives-without-conscience.html\" class=\"wtitle\">The Demise of Conservatism, and The Rise of Authoritarianism: A Review of John Dean&#8217;s Conservatives Without Conscience <\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer, attorney, and author Elaine Cassel reviews <u>Conservatives Without Conscience<\/u>, the most recent book by John Dean &#8212; former counsel to President Nixon, and a FindLaw columnist. In the book, Dean argues that conservatism today is a far cry from that of his youth, when Barry Goldwater was his ideological mentor and conservatism connoted a belief in limited government and staying out of people&#8217;s private lives. As Cassel describes, Dean faults today&#8217;s conservatives &#8212; from both the neoconservative and social conservative movements, and including the current Administration &#8212; for adopting intrusive and paternalistic views far afield from the views of traditional American conservatism.\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Sep. 01, 2006<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n      \n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-jeffrey-rosens-the-most-democratic-branch-how-the-courts-serve-america.html\" class=\"wauthor\">THOMAS HEALY<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-jeffrey-rosens-the-most-democratic-branch-how-the-courts-serve-america.html\" class=\"wtitle\">A Review of Jeffrey Rosen&#8217;s The Most Democratic Branch: How the Courts Serve America <\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and Seton Hall law professor Thomas Healy reviews George Washington law professor and New Republic Legal Affairs Editor Jeffrey Rosen&#8217;s most recent book, which argues that the federal courts typically follow national consensus, and ought to continue to do so. Healy contends that Rosen&#8217;s claims, while often correct as a descriptive matter, aren&#8217;t the right prescription for how our courts should function. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Aug. 04, 2006<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n<\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap><a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/why-robert-scheers-new-book-playing-president-is-sheer-delight-a-seasoned-journalist-shares-his-take-on-six-presidents-and-presidential-campaigns.html\" class=\"wauthor\">JOHN W. DEAN<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"middle\"><a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/why-robert-scheers-new-book-playing-president-is-sheer-delight-a-seasoned-journalist-shares-his-take-on-six-presidents-and-presidential-campaigns.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Why Robert Scheer&#8217;s New Book, Playing President, is Sheer Delight: A Seasoned Journalist Shares His Take on Six Presidents And Presidential Campaigns <\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw columnist and former counsel to the president John Dean discusses &#8212; and praises &#8212; reporter Robert Scheer&#8217;s new book on a series of presidencies: those of Nixon, Carter, Bush I, Reagan, Clinton, and Bush II. Dean finds particularly fascinating Scheer&#8217;s account of how the Carter campaign was almost destroyed by the Playboy interview &#8212; conducted by Scheer &#8212; in which the candidate admitted to &#8220;lusting in his heart.&#8221; <\/span><br>\n<span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Jul. 28, 2006<\/span><br>\n<p>\n\n<\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n<a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-terrorist-financing-game-a-review-of-government-insider-john-cassaras-new-book-hide-seek.html\" class=\"wauthor\">JEFF BREINHOLT<\/a>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"middle\">\n<a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-terrorist-financing-game-a-review-of-government-insider-john-cassaras-new-book-hide-seek.html\" class=\"wtitle\">The Terrorist Financing Game: A Review of Government Insider John Cassara&#8217;s New Book, Hide &amp; Seek <\/a>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw guest columnist and Department of Justice Counterterrorism Section Deputy Chief Jeff Breinholt assesses the recent book from prior government staffer John Cassara, Hide &amp; Seek: Intelligence, Law Enforcement and the Stalled War on Terrorist Finance. Breinholt contends that Cassara usually gets it right when it comes to issues surrounding law enforcement&#8217;s going after terrorist financing, but not always for the right reasons. In particular, Breinholt argues that Cassara needs to emphasis policy prescriptions that can trigger specific actions, rather than focusing on descriptions of the relevant situations and events.<\/span>\n<br>\n<span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Monday, Jun. 19, 2006<\/span><br>\n<p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/politics-and-law-courts-and-congress-reviews-of-two-recent-books-on-the-relationship-between-two-oft-clashing-american-traditions-and-institutions.html\" class=\"wauthor\">ELAINE CASSEL<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/politics-and-law-courts-and-congress-reviews-of-two-recent-books-on-the-relationship-between-two-oft-clashing-american-traditions-and-institutions.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Politics and Law, Courts and Congress: Reviews of Two Recent Books on the Relationship Between Two Oft-Clashing American Traditions and Institutions  <\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer, attorney, and author Elaine Cassel reviews two recent books &#8212; Michael C. Dorf&#8217;s No Litmus Test and Charles Gardner Geyh&#8217;s When Courts &amp; Congress Collide &#8212; that address two difficult interrelationships, between politics and law and the legislative and judicial branches, respectively. Cassel contrast the books&#8217; respective approaches, finding both useful and enlightening &#8212; and the two complementary. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, May. 05, 2006<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/how-activist-is-the-supreme-court-now-and-how-activist-has-it-been-in-the-past-a-review-of-two-books-that-claim-judicial-revolutions.html\" class=\"wauthor\">KEVIN J. DOYLE<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/how-activist-is-the-supreme-court-now-and-how-activist-has-it-been-in-the-past-a-review-of-two-books-that-claim-judicial-revolutions.html\" class=\"wtitle\">How Activist Is the Supreme Court Now -And How Activist Has It Been in the Past? A Review of Two Books that Claim Judicial Revolutions <\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer Kevin Doyle discusses two books that look at constitutional law, and how the Supreme Court has interpreted it, at a theoretical level &#8212; and recommends both. As Doyle explains, Thomas Keck&#8217;s The Most Activist Supreme Court In History examines the choices the Rehnquist Court made in addressing the Warren Court&#8217;s legacy. And Jed Rubenfeld&#8217;s Revolution by Judiciary ambitiously offers a new way &#8212; drawn from philosophy, and distinct from the &#8220;living constitution&#8221; theory &#8212; to look at how constitutional rights develop over time. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Oct. 28, 2005<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/shooting-from-the-hip-or-taking-careful-aim-how-should-people-make-decisions.html\" class=\"wauthor\">NEIL BUCHANAN<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/shooting-from-the-hip-or-taking-careful-aim-how-should-people-make-decisions.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Shooting From the Hip, or Taking Careful Aim: How Should People Make Decisions? <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Malcolm Gladwell&#8217;s Blink and Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner&#8217;s Freakonomics<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer, Rutgers law professor, and economist Neil Buchanan weighs in on two bestselling books that tackle &#8212; explicitly or implicitly &#8212; the question of how decisions are best made. Buchanan argues that the surface differences between the quick decisionmaking described in Malcolm Gladwell&#8217;s Blink, and the numbers-based analysis done in Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner&#8217;s Freakonomics, mask a strong commonality between the approaches of the two books.\n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Oct. 07, 2005<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/still-unequal-a-review-of-two-recent-books-on-sexual-harassment-by-catharine-mackinnon-and-theresa-beiner.html\" class=\"wauthor\">JESSELYN RADACK<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/still-unequal-a-review-of-two-recent-books-on-sexual-harassment-by-catharine-mackinnon-and-theresa-beiner.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Still Unequal: <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Two Recent Books on Sexual Harassment by Catharine MacKinnon and Theresa Beiner<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer, ABA Enemy Combatants Task Force member, and attorney Jesselyn Radack discusses two books on sexual harassment:  One on the theory behind it, authored by Catharine MacKinnon, and one on how the legal rules in this area tend to affect practical realities.  Radack finds valuable insights in, but also presents several important critiques of, both books.   She also notes that while some of what MacKinnon has had to say over her long career in this field &#8212; for instance, about pornography and privacy&#8211; seems somewhat outdated, much of her thought continues to have intense contemporary relevance, in part because society has not made enough progress in this area as might have been hoped.\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Sep. 2, 2005<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/can-novels-educate-us-about-complex-death-penalty-issues.html\" class=\"wauthor\">SAM WILLIAMSON<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/can-novels-educate-us-about-complex-death-penalty-issues.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Can Novels Educate Us About Complex Death Penalty Issues?<br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Two, By Richard North Patterson and Kermit Roosevelt, That Attempt to Do Just That<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Sam Williamson reviews two recent novels that involve the death penalty: Richard North Patterson&#8217;s &#8220;Conviction,&#8221; and Kermit Roosevelt&#8217;s &#8220;In the Shadow of the Law.&#8221; Williamson finds that established bestseller writer Patterson&#8217;s passionate polemic is involving and compelling, while Roosevelt&#8217;s first novel, at times, lacks realism. Both books, he notes, are ambitious &#8212; aiming to not only portray a death penalty, but to delve into some of the specifics of habeas litigation and even of the Anti-terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA).\n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Jul. 29, 2005<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/establishing-limits-a-review-of-two-books-on-how-religion-and-law-co-exist-in-america.html\" class=\"wauthor\">NOAH S. LEAVITT<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/establishing-limits-a-review-of-two-books-on-how-religion-and-law-co-exist-in-america.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Establishing Limits: A Review of Two Books on How Religion and Law Co-Exist In America <\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and human rights attorney Noah Leavitt weighs in on two recent books that make different arguments about how to navigate the difficult boundary between our Constitution&#8217;s Free Exercise Clause, which establishes the right to the free exercise of religion, and its Establishment Clause, which prohibits the government from acting to establish a religion. The books are Kent Greenawalt&#8217;s Does God Belong in Public Schools? and Marci Hamilton&#8217;s God vs. the Gavel: Religion and the Rule of Law. As Leavitt explains, Greenawalt and Hamilton take very different views on the Religion Clauses &#8212; a situation all the more interesting because Hamilton&#8217;s views have evolved from some that were more similar to those Greenawalt still holds. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Jun. 24, 2005<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/conservatism-religion-and-the-bush-administration.html\" class=\"wauthor\">ELAINE CASSEL<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/conservatism-religion-and-the-bush-administration.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Conservatism, Religion and the Bush Administration:  <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Two Recent Books on the White House, the Law, and The Influence of Christian Fundamentalists<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer, attorney, and author Elaine Cassel weighs in on two recent books examining outside influences on the Bush Administration&#8217;s first term. The first is Charles Tiefer&#8217;s Veering Right: How the Bush Administration Subverts the Law for Conservative Causes, in which the law professor and former legislative counsel delves into religious, corporate, and legislative influences on the Administration. The second is Esther Kaplan&#8217;s With God On Their Side: How Christian Fundamentalists Trampled Science, Policy, and Democracy in George W. Bush&#8217;s White House &#8212; in which the journalist discusses the Administration&#8217;s increasing emphasis on religious faith, and the influence of religious groups on the Administration. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, May. 20, 2005<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/two-recent-books-that-attack-neoconservatism-are-they-persuasive.html\" class=\"wauthor\">MATT HERRINGTON<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/two-recent-books-that-attack-neoconservatism-are-they-persuasive.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Two Recent Books That Attack Neoconservatism: Are They Persuasive?  <\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Matt Herrington discusses two recent books on neoconservatism: Stefan Halper &amp; Jonathan Clarke&#8217;s America Alone: The Neo-Conservatives and the Global Order, and Anne Norton&#8217;s Leo Strauss and the Politics of American Empire. Herrington notes that both books provide key insights into whether neoconservatives are the true heirs of former president Ronald Reagan and philosopher Leo Strauss. They thus raise such provocative questions as: Would Reagan have approved of modern neoconservative policies &#8212; and, in particular, approved of the Iraq War? And, would Leo Strauss have agreed with those who now call themselves Straussians?\n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Apr. 22, 2005<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-iraq-war-and-americas-tradition-of-foreign-policy-idealism-three-recent-books-illuminate-the-subject.html\" class=\"wauthor\">ANTHONY DWORKIN<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-iraq-war-and-americas-tradition-of-foreign-policy-idealism-three-recent-books-illuminate-the-subject.html\" class=\"wtitle\">The Iraq War and America&#8217;s Tradition of Foreign Policy Idealism: Three Recent Books Illuminate the Subject <\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer, journalist, and Crimes of War website editor Anthony Dworkin discusses three recent books relating, respectively, to Henry Kissinger&#8217;s foreign policy views; when a war can be deemed just; and how America should respond to its role as a leading world power. Dworkin relates each book to issues of idealism-versus-realpolitik that have arisen most recently in debates concerning the Iraq war&#8217;s morality &#8212; including the issue of the treatment of those who are imprisoned. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Monday, Mar. 28, 2005<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/two-recent-books-weigh-in-on-whether-and-where-legal-reform-is-needed.html\" class=\"wauthor\">MATT HERRINGTON<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/two-recent-books-weigh-in-on-whether-and-where-legal-reform-is-needed.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Two Recent Books Weigh In on Whether, and Where, Legal Reform Is Needed, <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">Addressing Tort Law Issues and Access to Justice for the Poor <\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Matt Herrington reviews two recent books on legal reform. The first, Distorting the Law, argues that the tort reform movement is largely based on proponents&#8217; spreading &#8220;tort tales&#8221; &#8212; like the story of the suit against McDonald&#8217;s for hot spilled coffee &#8212; that don&#8217;t really make a case for reform, and on the media&#8217;s inclination to give such &#8220;tort tales&#8221; prominent coverage. The second, Access to Justice, argues that while conventional wisdom holds America has too many lawyers, it actually has too few &#8212; or, at least, too few dedicated to representing the poor. Herrington examines the books&#8217; claims, and the evidence they muster to support them. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Feb. 25, 2005<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-literature-of-persecution-and-intolerance.html\" class=\"wauthor\">NOAH S. LEAVITT<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-literature-of-persecution-and-intolerance.html\" class=\"wtitle\">The Literature of Persecution and Intolerance: <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Two Current Bestsellers That Resonate with American Anxieties in a Post-September 11 World<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw columnist and human rights attorney Noah Leavitt reviews Philip Roth&#8217;s &#8220;The Plot Against America&#8221; and Stephen Greenblatt&#8217;s &#8220;Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare.&#8221; Leavitt argues that the two works, which seemingly very different, have much in common: Both address issues of persecution and intolerance, and address both their tragic cost, and the ways in which individuals can subvert and resist them. This commonality, Leavitt contends, makes the books all the more relevant in a post 9\/11 world. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Jan. 07, 2005<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/considering-presidential-rhetoric-as-a-window-into-national-identity.html\" class=\"wauthor\">G.J. RUSSELLO<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/considering-presidential-rhetoric-as-a-window-into-national-identity.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Considering Presidential Rhetoric as a Window Into National Identity: <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\"> A Review of Defining Americans<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Gerald Russello assesses the recent book by Mary Stuckey on how presidential rhetoric can afford insight into America&#8217;s national identity. Russello finds the book worthwhile, but overly ideological &#8212; as he explains, the book tracks only some of America&#8217;s divisions, and not all. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Oct. 29, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-surprising-publication-of-a-cia-insiders-harsh-critique-of-us-terror-tactics.html\" class=\"wauthor\">MARK S. ZAID<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-surprising-publication-of-a-cia-insiders-harsh-critique-of-us-terror-tactics.html\" class=\"wtitle\">The Surprising Publication of a CIA Insider&#8217;s Harsh Critique of U.S. Terror Tactics: <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review Of Imperial Hubris: Why The West Is Losing The War on Terror<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw columnist and national security\/First Amendment attorney Mark Zaid discusses a recent book that, he argues, is interesting not only for its contentions, but also for the fact that the CIA allowed it to be published in an election year. The book, Imperial Hubris, is authored by &#8220;Anonymous,&#8221; who has been revealed by the media as CIA veteran agent Michael Scheuer. It takes harsh issue with the Bush Administration&#8217;s &#8220;war on terrorism&#8221; policies. So why did the CIA allow its publication, when it could easily have blocked it, due to its regulations and contract with Scheuer? Zaid discusses possible explanations. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Oct. 15, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/reviving-fdrs-vision-of-what-guarantees-americans-deserve.html\" class=\"wauthor\">MATT HERRINGTON<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/reviving-fdrs-vision-of-what-guarantees-americans-deserve.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Reviving FDR&#8217;s Vision of What Guarantees Americans Deserve: <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Cass Sunstein&#8217;s The Second Bill of Rights<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Matt Herrington discusses U. Chicago law professor Cass Sunstein&#8217;s provocative new book on FDR&#8217;s &#8220;Second Bill of Rights.&#8221; As Herrington explains, this Second Bill of Rights was intended to be accomplished not by constitutional amendment, but by statute &#8212; and in the end, was accomplished only partially by statute. Sunstein argues, however, that Warren Court decisions went a long way toward making this Second Bill of Rights part of American law. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Sep. 24, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/have-americas-anti-terror-laws-destroyed-individual-rights.html\" class=\"wauthor\">NOAH LEAVITT<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/have-americas-anti-terror-laws-destroyed-individual-rights.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Have America&#8217;s Anti-Terror Laws Destroyed Individual Rights? <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Elaine Cassel&#8217;s The War on Civil Liberties<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer Noah Leavitt reviews a new book on civil liberties in an age of terrorism, by attorney and author Elaine Cassel (who has also written for this site). Leavitt lauds Cassel&#8217;s book for its adept explanation and analysis of complex anti-terror laws, court and plea bargaining developments, and law enforcement tactics since 9\/11. The book raises provocative questions about whether the recent expansion of executive power will be a permanent one &#8212; and whether the war on terror also encompasses other, far more troubling kinds of wars. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Sep. 10, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/are-the-laws-lessons-also-life-lessons.html\" class=\"wauthor\">ANITA RAMASASTRY<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/are-the-laws-lessons-also-life-lessons.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Are the Law&#8217;s Lessons Also Life Lessons?: <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Winning Every Time: How to Use the Skills of a Lawyer in the Trials of Your Life<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and U. Washington law professor Anita Ramasastry assesses a new self-help book by attorney and Fox News and NPR legal analyst Lis Wiehl. In the book, Wiehl contends that legal strategies can work outside the law, too. As Ramasastry explains, Wiehl offers an eight-step approach to winning arguments, that is drawn from the approaches lawyers use to win court cases. Wiehl also provides practical applications of how these steps can be used in everyday life. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Aug. 27, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/rethinking-the-story-of-alger-hiss.html\" class=\"wauthor\">STANLEY I. KUTLER<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/rethinking-the-story-of-alger-hiss.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Rethinking the Story of Alger Hiss: <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of a New and Original Book on the Life of the Controversial Spy<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">Convicted as a spy, but consistent in proclaiming his innocence thereafter, Alger Hiss remains a controversial figure in history. FindLaw book reviewer and author Stanley Kutler reviews a new biography of Hiss by Edward White &#8212; praising it for offering a fresh take on a well-known debate. As Kutler describes it, White does not focus solely on the question: Was Hiss really guilty? (White concludes he was.) After considering this issue, White goes further, asking another question: Why did Hiss maintain his innocence so persuasively for so many, for so long, in the face of strong evidence of his guilt? \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Aug. 06, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-minister-who-walked-the-walk.html\" class=\"wauthor\">RODGER CITRON<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-minister-who-walked-the-walk.html\" class=\"wtitle\">The Minister Who Walked the Walk: <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of A Recent Biography of the Religious and Political Activist William Sloane Coffin Jr.<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Rodger Citron weighs in on a recent biography of an unusual and admirable figure &#8212; William Sloane Coffin Jr. As Citron explains, Coffin &#8212; a minister who was intensely involved in politics in the 1960s and beyond &#8212; has previously had his political history chronicled, but this book goes into his interesting personal history, as well. The book is also notable because the author procured cooperation from the subject and his family. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Jul. 23, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/when-it-comes-to-spy-versus-spy-is-fact-stranger-than-fiction.html\" class=\"wauthor\">MARK S. ZAID<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/when-it-comes-to-spy-versus-spy-is-fact-stranger-than-fiction.html\" class=\"wtitle\">When It Comes to Spy Versus Spy, Is Fact Stranger Than Fiction?  <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Frederick Hitz&#8217;s The Great Game: The Myth and Reality of Espionage<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and national security attorney Mark Zaid reviews former CIA inspector general Frederick Hitz&#8217;s recent book, The Great Game, which contrasts spy novels with real-life accounts of spying. Zaid assesses the book as a good introduction for those unfamiliar with the world of espionage, but a disappointment for readers with deep prior knowledge of the subject. He also notes a few missed opportunities for interesting inquiries into the spy novel\/spy reality dynamic.\n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Jul. 09, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/could-america-lose-its-identity-in-its-fight-against-al-qaeda.html\" class=\"wauthor\">NOAH LEAVITT<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/could-america-lose-its-identity-in-its-fight-against-al-qaeda.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Could America Lose Its Identity in Its Fight Against Al Qaeda?: <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Michael Ignatieff&#8217;s Lesser Evil: Political Ethics in an Age of Terror<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and human rights attorney Noah Leavitt reviews Harvard professor Michael Ignatieff&#8217;s recent book on how democracies should cope with terrorism, how they do cope with it in practice, and how they can both address terrorism, and retain civil liberties. Leavitt focuses, in particular, on several major prescriptions of Ignatieff&#8217;s: Retain judicial review, maintain a climate of openness, and never resort to torture. Leavitt argues that the Bush Administration has violated each of these prescriptions. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Jun. 25, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/dispelling-myths-about-terrorism-and-terrorists.html\" class=\"wauthor\">MATT HERRINGTON<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/dispelling-myths-about-terrorism-and-terrorists.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Dispelling Myths About Terrorism and Terrorists:  <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Marc Sageman&#8217;s Understanding Terror Networks<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Matt Herrington assesses a new book by Marc Sageman collecting a great deal of factual material about terrorism and terrorists. Suggesting that the West will never defeat terrorism until it better understands it, Sageman dispels some of the myths about terrorists and terrorism, and offer predictions about how Al Qaeda attacks will evolve &#8212; though one prediction, as Herrington notes, was contradicted by the Madrid bombings. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Jun. 18, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/under-the-us-tax-system-do-the-rich-really-get-richer.html\" class=\"wauthor\">NEIL H. BUCHANAN<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/under-the-us-tax-system-do-the-rich-really-get-richer.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Under the U.S. Tax System, Do the Rich Really Get Richer? <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of David Cay Johnston&#8217;s Perfectly Legal<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and Rutgers tax law professor Neil Buchanan assesses reporter David Cay Johnston&#8217;s new book, Perfectly Legal: The Covert Campaign to Rig Our Tax System to Benefit the Super Rich&#8211;and Cheat Everybody Else. Buchanan argues that, as Johnston&#8217;s book illustrates, tax law is an area fraught with myths, misconceptions, and ideological distortions.\n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Jun. 11, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/brown-v-board-of-education-as-social-and-political-history.html\" class=\"wauthor\">ELAINE CASSEL<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/brown-v-board-of-education-as-social-and-political-history.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Brown v. Board of Education as Social and Political History:  <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Michael Klarman&#8217;s From Jim Crow to Civil Rights<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer, attorney and author Elaine Cassel reviews a recent book by University of Virginia law and history professor Michael Klarman that offers a new, interesting take on Brown v. Board of Education. As Cassel explains, Klarman sees Brown as an instance of the Supreme Court&#8217;s Justices&#8217; mirroring a growing moral feeling on the part of the public. Klarman also suggests that, more generally, the Court will often tend to mirror public moral sentiment. Cassel tests this contention on a number of different areas of constitutional law. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Jun. 04, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-tempest-in-a-teapot-or-something-more.html\" class=\"wauthor\">SAM WILLIAMSON<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-tempest-in-a-teapot-or-something-more.html\" class=\"wtitle\">A Tempest in a Teapot, Or Something More? <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of The Battle For Augusta National<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Sam Williamson reviews Sports Illustrated reporter Alan Shipnuck&#8217;s recent book, The Battle For Augusta National, which focuses on the events and personalities relating to the controversy over whether women golfers would be allowed to join Augusta National Golf Club, the host of the Masters Tournament. In Williamson&#8217;s view, this interesting, well-reported story may not have justified a whole book, as opposed to an article; he explains why.\n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, May. 28, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/justice-frankfurters-junior-partner.html\" class=\"wauthor\">ROGER K. NEWMAN<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/justice-frankfurters-junior-partner.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Justice Frankfurter&#8217;s &#8220;Junior Partner&#8221; <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Norman Silber&#8217;s Book on Philip Elman<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Roger Newman discusses an interesting new book by Hofstra law professor Norman Silber on lawyer Philip Elman. Elman&#8217;s place in American legal history derives from his close friendship with &#8212; and clerkship with &#8212; Felix Frankfurter, as well as his service in the Solicitor General&#8217;s office and at the Federal Trade Commission. As Newman explains, for the book Silber &#8220;adapted the transcripts of a series of interviews he conducted for the Columbia Oral History Project in the early 1980s into a seamless memoir written in Elman&#8217;s voice &#8212; and Silber has also added extensive, helpful interpretive commentary.&#8221; \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, May. 21, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-supreme-courts-search-for-doctrine-in-the-constitution.html\" class=\"wauthor\">KEVIN J. DOYLE<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-supreme-courts-search-for-doctrine-in-the-constitution.html\" class=\"wtitle\">The Supreme Court&#8217;s Search for Doctrine in the Constitution: <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Charles Fried&#8217;s Saying What the Law Is<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Kevin Doyle assesses a recent book on constitutional adjudication by former Solicitor General and state Supreme Court Justice, and now professor of law, Charles Fried. Taking three areas of constitutional law as examples, Doyle explains how, in each case, Fried&#8217;s views track or diverge from conventional wisdom. In particular, Fried offers an original take on free speech doctrine that emphasizes &#8220;freedom of the mind.&#8221; \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, May. 14, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/policy-wars.html\" class=\"wauthor\">JOANNE MARINER<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/policy-wars.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Policy Wars:  <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of John Shattuck&#8217;s Freedom on Fire<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and human rights attorney Joanne Mariner reviews Clinton Administration human rights official and self-described &#8220;human rights hawk&#8221; John Shattuck&#8217;s recent book, Freedom on Fire. The book details Shattuck&#8217;s experiences with trying to make human rights progress despite bureaucratic infighting and other obstacles, and offers specific analyses of how the Administration grappled with Haiti, Rwanda, Bosnia, and China. Mariner comments on his efforts, and notes whether the Iraq War would fulfill his criteria for humanitarian intervention.\n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, May. 07, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/can-suing-not-just-indicting-be-a-weapon-against-terrorists.html\" class=\"wauthor\">ANITA RAMASASTRY<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/can-suing-not-just-indicting-be-a-weapon-against-terrorists.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Can Suing &#8212; Not Just Indicting &#8212; Be a Weapon Against Terrorists? <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Civil Litigation Against Terrorism<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and U. Washington law professor Anita Ramasastry assesses a recent collection of essays and other materials that address the question: Can U.S. civil lawsuits be a part of efforts against terrorism? Ramasastry surveys the current state of the law, as described in the essays, and explores the theoretical arguments made by Professor Ruth Wedgwood, and the collection&#8217;s editor, Professor John Norton Moore. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Apr. 30, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-reporters-account-of-an-ex-cons-struggle-to-reenter-society.html\" class=\"wauthor\">ELAINE CASSEL<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-reporters-account-of-an-ex-cons-struggle-to-reenter-society.html\" class=\"wtitle\">A Reporter&#8217;s Account of an Ex-Con&#8217;s Struggle to Reenter Society: <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Jennifer Gonnerman&#8217;s Life on the Outside<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer, attorney, and author Elaine Cassel reviews a recent book by Village Voice reporter Jennifer Gonnerman, Life on the Outside: The Prison Odyssey of Elaine Bartlett. Cassel praises Gonnerman for affording insight into the problems that the many, many Americans who have been incarcerated &#8212; often for first or minor offenses &#8212; face when they return to society. As Cassel explains, Gonnerman focuses on the experience of a particular woman, Elaine Bartlett, who served sixteen years in New York prison for a first-offense drug carrier conviction. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Apr. 23, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/butterflies-may-be-free-but-should-expression-be.html\" class=\"wauthor\">SETH STERN<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/butterflies-may-be-free-but-should-expression-be.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Butterflies May Be Free, But Should Expression Be? <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Lawrence Lessig&#8217;s Free Culture<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and legal affairs reporter Seth Stern weighs in on prominent cyberlawyer Lawrence Lessig&#8217;s latest book, Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. In this book, as Stern explains, Lessig goes beyond his usual terrain, the Internet, to make a broad argument about the disappearance of the public domain as copyrights become lengthier, and more easily enforceable. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Apr. 16, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/is-dubyas-presidency-even-poorer-than-tricky-dicks.html\" class=\"wauthor\">EDWARD LAZARUS<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/is-dubyas-presidency-even-poorer-than-tricky-dicks.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Is Dubya&#8217;s Presidency Even Poorer Than Tricky Dick&#8217;s? <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of John Dean&#8217;s Worse Than Watergate<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer, attorney, and author Edward Lazarus reviews the controvesrial recent book on the George W. Bush Administration by FindLaw columnist and former counsel to the president John Dean. Lazarus takes issue with Dean&#8217;s contention that the Bush White House compares unfavorably even with the Nixon White House. But Lazarus finds much to praise in Dean&#8217;s specific and knowlegeable account of why he believes the Bush White House&#8217;s penchant for secrecy and, he argues, its pattern of misrepresentation, are Nixonian.\n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Apr. 09, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/can-stereotyping-and-profiling-ever-be-good-things.html\" class=\"wauthor\">MATT HERRINGTON<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/can-stereotyping-and-profiling-ever-be-good-things.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Can Stereotyping, and Profiling, Ever Be Good Things? <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Frederick Schauer&#8217;s New Book on the Virtues of Generalization <\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Matt Herrington assesses Harvard philosophy professor Frederick Schauer&#8217;s recent defense of why generalizations can be good, in his book Profiles, Probabilities and Stereotypes. Schauer contends that since generalization and &#8220;profiling&#8221; are inevitable, we should try to make the bases for them as transparent as possible &#8212; and Herrington explains how the theory might play out in controversial war-on-terrorism settings such as scrutiny of airline passengers. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Apr. 02, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/contrasting-a-nuns-view-with-a-journalists.html\" class=\"wauthor\">MARCI HAMILTON<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/contrasting-a-nuns-view-with-a-journalists.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Contrasting a Nun&#8217;s View With a Journalist&#8217;s: <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Two Recent Books on The Catholic Church Clergy Abuse Debacle<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and Cardozo law professor Marci Hamilton contrasts two very different books on the Catholic Church clergy sexual abuse scandal. The first is Karol Jackowski&#8217;s The Silence We Keep: A Nun&#8217;s View of the Catholic Priest Scandal. As the title suggests, Jackowski is a nun who brings a religious and historical perspective to the scandal. The second is reporter David France&#8217;s Our Fathers: The Secret Life of the Catholic Church in an Age of Scandal &#8212; a chronological account of the unfolding of events related to the scandal. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Mar. 26, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-net-positive-read.html\" class=\"wauthor\">SAM WILLIAMSON<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-net-positive-read.html\" class=\"wtitle\">A Net Positive Read: <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Brad Meltzer&#8217;s Legal Thriller, The Zero Game<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Sam Williamson assesses Brad Meltzer&#8217;s latest legal thrilled, The Zero Game. Based on the idea that those who can influence legislation, are also literally betting on it, the thriller follows two friends and fellow Capitol Hill staffers who get themselves into trouble with just such betting. Williamson contends that Meltzer&#8217;s convincing portrayal of the world of D.C. lobbyists and staffers puts this thriller a cut above other, similar books. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Mar. 19, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-hero-for-his-own-time-and-ours.html\" class=\"wauthor\">ALAN BARON<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-hero-for-his-own-time-and-ours.html\" class=\"wtitle\">A Hero For His Own Time and Ours: <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Roy Jenkins&#8217;s Recent FDR Biography<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Alan Baron reviews Roy Jenkins&#8217;s recent book, Franklin Delano Roosevelt. In his assessment, Jenkins&#8217;s book is as incisive as it is brief. The book covers FDR&#8217;s early years, his marriage, his presidency, and his role in World War II, and on each topic, Baron explains, Jenkins&#8217;s take is smart and insightful. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Mar. 12, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/before-reagan-was-reagan.html\" class=\"wauthor\">GERALD J. RUSSELLO<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/before-reagan-was-reagan.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Before Reagan was Reagan: <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Lou Cannon&#8217;s Book on Ronald Reagan&#8217;s Rise to Power<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Gerald Russello discusses journalist Lou Cannon&#8217;s recent book on Ronald Reagan, which focuses on his early years and years as California governor. Russello praises Cannon&#8217;s for covering Reagan&#8217;s flaws as well as his virtues, and offering a comprehensive look at the way these years functioned as a prelude to his Presidency. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Mar. 05, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-vietnam-war-through-a-glass-clearly.html\" class=\"wauthor\">RODGER D. CITRON<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-vietnam-war-through-a-glass-clearly.html\" class=\"wtitle\">The Vietnam War, Through a Glass Clearly: <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of David Maraniss&#8217;s They Marched Into Sunlight<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Rodger Citron assesses a recent book by David Maraniss which counterposes two Vietnam War era events: an ambush of a United States infantry battalion in the jungle of Vietnam, and an antiwar protest against Dow Chemical Company at the University of Wisconsin that culminated in a bloody confrontation with the Madison police. Citron praises Maraniss&#8217;s accounts of both, and explain how his book fits in the context of other works about the era. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Feb. 27, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/theres-far-more-to-marbury-and-many-other-cases-than-just-a-holding.html\" class=\"wauthor\">MATT HERRINGTON<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/theres-far-more-to-marbury-and-many-other-cases-than-just-a-holding.html\" class=\"wtitle\">There&#8217;s Far More to Marbury &#8212; and Many Other Cases &#8212; Than Just a Holding <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Constitutional Law Stories<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Matt Herrington assesses a recent collection of essays on the stories behind famous constitutional law precedents &#8212; from the lauded, such as Marbury v. Marbury, to the reviled, such as the Dred Scott decision. The collection, entitled Constitutional Law Stories was edited by FindLaw columnist and Columbia law professor Michael Dorf, and offers examples of the work of both eminent and emerging legal scholars. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Feb. 20, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-internet-comes-of-voting-age.html\" class=\"wauthor\">PETER LURIE<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-internet-comes-of-voting-age.html\" class=\"wtitle\">The Internet Comes of (Voting) Age: <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Bruce Bimber and Richard Davis&#8217;s Campaigning Online: The Internet and U.S. Elections<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Peter Lurie assesses Campaigning Online, a recent book on the Intenet&#8217;s relationships to elections in the United States. Lurie explains why, based on empirical evidence collected by the book&#8217;s authors, hopes that that Internet would transform U.S. elections seem to be at least partially off the mark. Lurie focuses, in particular, on the debate over the &#8220;echo chamber&#8221; effect, which arises when campaign sites tend to preach only to the converted. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Feb. 13, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-must-read-book-that-explains-rubinomics-and-much-more.html\" class=\"wauthor\">JOHN DEAN<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-must-read-book-that-explains-rubinomics-and-much-more.html\" class=\"wtitle\">A Must Read Book That Explains Rubinomics, and Much More: <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">Robert Rubin and Jacob Weisberg&#8217;s In An Uncertain World: Tough Choices from Wall Street to Washington <\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and former counsel to the President John Dean makes the case that Robert Rubin&#8217;s new memoir (written with Jacob Weisberg) of his Clinton Administration days is not only excellent, but a true must read. Dean contends that the book persuasively establishes the virtues not only of Rubin&#8217;s economic judgment, but also of President Clinton&#8217;s. He also argues that President Bush&#8217;s economic decisionmaking compares unfavorably to that of both Rubin and Clinton. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Feb. 06, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-intertwining-of-love-and-law.html\" class=\"wauthor\">LAURA HODES<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-intertwining-of-love-and-law.html\" class=\"wtitle\">The Intertwining of Love and Law: <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Ayelet Waldman&#8217;s Recent Novel Daughter&#8217;s Keeper <\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Laura Hodes discusses the recent legal novel Daughter&#8217;s Keeper, by Harvard Law-trained novelist Ayelet Waldman. Hodes contends that Waldman&#8217;s work strikes a masterful balance &#8212; managing both to offer keen insight into the working of the law (here, the drug laws), and to sketch moving portraits of family relationships. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Jan. 30, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-lost-shakespeare-play-prompts-ivy-league-intrigue.html\" class=\"wauthor\">SAM WILLIAMSON<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-lost-shakespeare-play-prompts-ivy-league-intrigue.html\" class=\"wtitle\">A Lost Shakespeare Play Prompts Ivy League Intrigue: <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of William Martin&#8217;s Harvard Yard<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Sam Williamson assesses a recent novel by William Martin that centers on Harvard and its history. The novel focuses on the story of a lost Shakespeare play that ends up in the hands of Harvard&#8217;s founder. Williamson &#8212; himself a Harvard law grad &#8212; contends that the novel is much too Harvard-centric even for alums, and fails to provide a satisfying solution to its central mystery. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Jan. 23, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/two-unsolved-murders-and-a-trial-of-the-century.html\" class=\"wauthor\">MARK S. ZAID<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/two-unsolved-murders-and-a-trial-of-the-century.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Two Unsolved Murders and a &#8220;Trial Of The Century&#8221;:  <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of And The Dead Shall Rise, An Account of the Mary Phagan and Leo Frank Murders <\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Mark Zaid assesses Steve Oney&#8217;s recent, comprehensive look at the early Twentieth Century murders both of Mary Phagan and of the man who was accused of killing her, Leo Frank. Frank &#8212; who may well have been innocent &#8212; was convicted and sentenced to death; his sentence was later commuted to life, but a lynching party subsequently murdered him. Zaid explains the larger historical context of the two murder cases, and notes how much Oney has added to this frequently-told story &#8212; including Oney&#8217;s listing of the names of those who participating in the lynching of Frank. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Jan. 16, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/is-americas-so-called-worst-president-unfairly-condemned.html\" class=\"wauthor\">MATT HERRINGTON<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/is-americas-so-called-worst-president-unfairly-condemned.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Is America&#8217;s So-Called Worst President Unfairly Condemned? <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of John Dean&#8217;s Warren G. Harding<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Matt Herrington assesses John Dean&#8217;s revisionist account of the Harding Presidency, one in a series of volumes on American Presidents edited by historian Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. Dean&#8217;s work counters both the idea that Harding was our worst President, and the belief that he was personally involved in his Administration&#8217;s corruption. It also covers Harding&#8217;s surprisingly modern campaign strategies. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Jan. 09, 2004<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/an-imperfect-courageous-attorney.html\" class=\"wauthor\">NOAH LEAVITT<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/an-imperfect-courageous-attorney.html\" class=\"wtitle\">An Imperfect, Courageous Attorney <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of A Book By the Lawyer Who Defended One of the 1993 World Trade Center Bombers<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and human rights attorney Noah Leavitt reviews an unusual lawyer&#8217;s memoir by Robert Precht, who defended one of the men implicated in &#8212; and later convicted in &#8212; the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. As Leavitt explains, Precht&#8217;s memoir, unlike many other lawyers&#8217;, is more self-castigating than self-complimentary; it bravely explores the emotional and psychological difficulties in representing someone accused of such a heinous crime, and also admits the way careerism can affect a lawyer&#8217;s representation of his client.\n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Dec. 19, 2003<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/is-world-peace-through-conflict-prevention-possible.html\" class=\"wauthor\">LEE H. HAMILTON<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/is-world-peace-through-conflict-prevention-possible.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Is World Peace Through Conflict Prevention Possible?  <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of David Hamburg&#8217;s No More Killing Fields<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer, 9\/11 Commission Vice-President, and President of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Lee Hamilton assesses David Hamburg&#8217;s recent work on conflict prevention. Hamburg covers topics ranging from the lessons of World War II, to the value of preventive action and early warning, to the need for international cooperation, and more. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Dec. 12, 2003<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-case-of-the-century.html\" class=\"wauthor\">RODGER D. CITRON<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-case-of-the-century.html\" class=\"wtitle\">The Case of the Century <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of a New Book on Caste, Culture, and Brown v. Board of Education<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Rodger Citron reviews a new book entitled Brown v. Board of Education: Caste, Culture, and the Constitution. Citron&#8217;s discusses two aspects of the work in particular: Its attention to the history and cultural context surrounding the Brown decision, and its insight into the controversy over how great Justice Felix Frankfurter&#8217;s role in the decision actually was. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Dec. 05, 2003<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-portrait-of-a-case-that-settled-too-soon.html\" class=\"wauthor\">MATT HERRINGTON<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-portrait-of-a-case-that-settled-too-soon.html\" class=\"wtitle\">A Portrait of a Case That Settled Too Soon <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Inside a Class Action: The Holocaust and the Swiss Banks<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book review and attorney Matt Herrington takes an in-depth look at the settlement of the litigation against Swiss banks for their conduct during the Holocaust. Herrington asseses a recent book by Jane Schapiro on the litigation, and argues that, based in part on events that follow those recounted in the book, the decision to settle may well have been unwise and premature. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Nov. 21, 2003<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-justice-robert-jacksons-recently-discovered-fdr-memoir-that-man.html\" class=\"wauthor\">ROGER NEWMAN<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-justice-robert-jacksons-recently-discovered-fdr-memoir-that-man.html\" class=\"wtitle\">A Review of Justice Robert Jackson&#8217;s Recently Discovered FDR Memoir, That Man <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">An Important New Account, Beautifully Edited<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and author Roger Newman weighs in on a newly unearthed memoir about FDR by Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson. Newman discusses how the book illuminates not only FDR, but also Jackson himself &#8212; and also reveals FDR&#8217;s influence on Jackson&#8217;s career and choices. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Nov. 14, 2003<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/johnny-we-hardly-knew-ye.html\" class=\"wauthor\">ALAN I. BARON<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/johnny-we-hardly-knew-ye.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Johnny, We Hardly Knew Ye <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of A Recent Book on John O&#8217;Neill, The Heroic Counterterror Expert Who Died on 9\/11<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Alan Baron assesses a recent book by journalist Murray Weiss, The Man Who Warned America: The Life and Death of John O&#8217;Neill, The FBI&#8217;s Embattled Counterterror Warrior. Killed in the collapse of the South Tower of the World Trade Center, Baron was both a hero and a maverick. One interesting question Weiss and Baron, who was a friend of O&#8217;Neill&#8217;s, both discuss is whether brilliant mavericks like O&#8217;Neill could find a place in today&#8217;s government agencies &#8212; and whether a new one would have to be created to accommodate them. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Nov. 07, 2003<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/why-citizens-should-be-concerned-when-their-government-mistreats-aliens.html\" class=\"wauthor\">ELAINE CASSEL<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/why-citizens-should-be-concerned-when-their-government-mistreats-aliens.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Why Citizens Should Be Concerned When Their Government Mistreats Aliens <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of David Cole&#8217;s Enemy Aliens<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw columnist, attorney, and author Elaine Cassel reviews Georgetown law professor and Nation correspondent David Cole&#8217;s provocative recent book on the &#8220;war on terror,&#8221; Enemy Aliens. Cole&#8217;s thesis is that the way the government treats immigrants, is often the way it will soon treat citizens, too. To prove his point, he draws on examples ranging from &#8217;80s prosecutions of alleged communists, including the L.A. 8, to contemporary examples from Guantanamo Bay. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Oct. 31, 2003<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/are-sexual-rights-privacy-rights-natural-rights-neither-or-both.html\" class=\"wauthor\">PETER LURIE<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/are-sexual-rights-privacy-rights-natural-rights-neither-or-both.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Are Sexual Rights Privacy Rights, Natural Rights, Neither, or Both? <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Sexual Rights in America<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Peter Lurie assesses a new book by a trio of psychology experts, Sexual Rights in America. The book examines the respects in which American law falls short of protecting &#8220;the right to choose how, when, and with whom we have sex.&#8221; The authors argue that protecting privacy alone is not enough &#8212; a recognition of sexual rights must go further. Lurie is skeptical, however, of their alternative approach. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Oct. 24, 2003<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/prosecute-or-perish.html\" class=\"wauthor\">ADAM J. FREEDMAN<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/prosecute-or-perish.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Prosecute or Perish <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">Former Prosecutor Alafair Burke&#8217;s Impressively Realistic Legal Thriller <\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer, attorney, and author Adam J. Freedman assesses a recent novel by former prosecutor and now-law-professor Alafair Burke, Judgment Calls. Freedman compliments Burke&#8217;s sense of plotting and suspense, and explains why Burke&#8217;s novel offers a more realistic portrait of prosecutors&#8217; lives than many others do. \n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Oct. 17, 2003<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/plaintiffs-lawyer-as-hero.html\" class=\"wauthor\">MATT HERRINGTON<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/plaintiffs-lawyer-as-hero.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Plaintiff&#8217;s Lawyer as Hero: <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Adam Penenberg&#8217;s Tragic Indifference<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Matt Herrington reviews journalist Adam Penenberg&#8217;s Tragic Indifference: One Man&#8217;s Battle with the Auto Industry Over the Dangers of SUVs. The book discusses the Ford Explorer\/Firestone tire controversy as it played out in the courts, in Congressional hearings, and in the media. Herrington contends that while the story of the case is compelling, Penenberg&#8217;s book offers a &#8220;good guys versus bad guys&#8221; view that is too simplistic.\n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Oct. 10, 2003<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-political-novel-on-gun-rights-that-fails-to-show-both-sides.html\" class=\"wauthor\">SAM WILLIAMSON<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-political-novel-on-gun-rights-that-fails-to-show-both-sides.html\" class=\"wtitle\">A Political Novel On Gun Rights That Fails to Show Both Sides: <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Richard North Patterson&#8217;s Balance of Power<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">What happens when thrillers get political? FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Sam Williamson discusses Richard North Patterson&#8217;s Balance of Power as a case in point. Williamson faults Balance of Power &#8212; another in a series of novels by Patterson featuring protagonist, and now President, Kerry Kilcannon &#8212; not for being political, but for only presenting one side of the political issue it explores, gun control.\n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Oct. 03, 2003<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/is-the-supreme-court-the-sum-of-its-parts.html\" class=\"wauthor\">DAVID LUNDSGAARD<\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/is-the-supreme-court-the-sum-of-its-parts.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Is the Supreme Court the Sum of Its Parts? <br><span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of the Recent Nine-Essay Collection Rehnquist Justice<\/span><\/a>\n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\">FindLaw book reviewer and attorney David Lundsgaard assesses a new essay collected, Rehnquist Justice: Understanding the Court Dynamic. Composed of nine essays by nine different writers &#8212; one on each Supreme Court Justice &#8212; the collection aims to paint a portrait of the Court as a composite of the nine individuals who share its bench. Lundsgaard argues that the collection is a worthy one even though it does betray some misconceptions, along the way, about the nature of judging at the Supreme Court.\n\n        <\/span>\n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Sep. 26, 2003<\/span><br>\n        <p>\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/barman.html\" class=\"wauthor\">GERALD RUSSELLO<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/barman.html\" class=\"wtitle\">A Lawyer&#8217;s Life:: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Alex Wellen&#8217;s Witty Memoir, <u>Barman<\/u><\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Gerald Russello reviews Alex Wellen&#8217;s \nBarman &#8212; a memoir of Wellen&#8217;s law school experiences, his exhausting bar study, \nhis law firm years, and his ultimate departure from the law to become a TV \nproducer.  Russello applauds Wellen&#8217;s humor and sincerity, and finds the book a \nworthy read, but points out ways it might have been improved. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Sep. 19, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n\n\n<\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-prosecutors.html\" class=\"wauthor\">SETH STERN<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-prosecutors.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Crime and Punishment in Sacramento: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Gary Delsohn&#8217;s The Prosecutors<\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer, attorney and journalist Seth Stern reviews journalist Gary Delsohn&#8217;s The Prosecutors &#8212; a nonfiction account deriving from a year Delsohn devoted to observing Sacramento prosecutors and criminal trials. Stern argues that Delsohn overidentifies with the prosecutors he is covering, and chose the wrong trial to focus on, but nonetheless finds parts of the book compelling. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Sep. 12, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/teaching-the-rich-to-stay-rich.html\" class=\"wauthor\">JOANNA GROSSMAN<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/teaching-the-rich-to-stay-rich.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Teaching the Rich to Stay Rich: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Roy Williams and Vic Preisser&#8217;s Preparing Heirs<\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and Hofstra law professor Joanna Grossman discusses a recent book on a problem many of us may wish we had: how to successfully transfer huge sums of wealth within a family, through wills and otherwise. The book, Preparing Heirs, reveals that over 70% of such transfers fail, in that beneficiaries lose control of the transferred money, and suggests how families can make such transfers more successful, more often. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Sep. 05, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-sidney-blumenthals-the-clinton-wars.html\" class=\"wauthor\">LAURA HODES<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-sidney-blumenthals-the-clinton-wars.html\" class=\"wtitle\">An Insider Account of Attack Politics, And Media Complicity: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Sidney Blumenthal&#8217;s The Clinton Wars<\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Laura Hodes reviews the recent book on the Clinton years, and the contested 2000 election, by veteran journalist and former Clinton Administration communications director Sidney Blumenthal. Hodes praises Blumenthal&#8217;s ability to bring together history, memoir, and political argument, and argues that we are right to worry about the political and media trends he describes. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Aug. 29, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-superb-stylebook-for-law-professors-and-students-alike-eugene-volokhs-academic-legal-writing.html\" class=\"wauthor\">MATTHEW HERRINGTON<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-superb-stylebook-for-law-professors-and-students-alike-eugene-volokhs-academic-legal-writing.html\" class=\"wtitle\">A Superb Stylebook for Law Professors and Students Alike: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\">Eugene Volokh&#8217;s Academic Legal Writing<\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Matthew Herrington evaluates UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh&#8217;s new stylebook for writing law review articles, student notes, and seminar papers.\u00a0 Herrington praises Volokh&#8217;s book highly for both its sharp style rules, and its savvy guide to actually getting a law review article published. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Aug. 22, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-amy-gutmans-the-anniversary.html\" class=\"wauthor\">SAM WILLIAMSON<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-amy-gutmans-the-anniversary.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Conspiracy Theory?: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Amy Gutman&#8217;s <u>The Anniversary<\/u><\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Sam Williamson reviews former attorney and journalist Amy Gutman&#8217;s new legal thriller, The Anniversary.\u00a0 Williamson compliments Gutman&#8217;s storytelling flair and adept characterizations, but takes issue with her ending (though without spoiling it).\u00a0 <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Aug. 15, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-new-unabashed-mccarthyism-a-review-of-treason-liberal-treachery-from-the-cold-war-to-the-war-on-terrorism.html\" class=\"wauthor\">MARK S. ZAID<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-new-unabashed-mccarthyism-a-review-of-treason-liberal-treachery-from-the-cold-war-to-the-war-on-terrorism.html\" class=\"wtitle\">The New, Unabashed McCarthyism: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Treason: Liberal Treachery From The Cold War To The War On Terrorism<\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Mark Zaid reviews conservative commentator Ann Coulter&#8217;s recent book, Treason.\u00a0 Zaid takes strong issue with Coulter&#8217;s complimentary portrayal of Senator Joseph McCarthy &#8212; including her interpretation of the related Vernona papers, disclosed in 1995.\u00a0 Zaid also find Coulter&#8217;s thesis wildly overstated, and her evidence sorely lacking. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Aug. 08, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-the-contradictions-of-american-capital-punishment.html\" class=\"wauthor\">ELAINE CASSEL<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-the-contradictions-of-american-capital-punishment.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Will Capital Punishment Ever Die? \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of <u>The Contradictions of American Capital Punishment<\/u><\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer, attorney and author Elaine Cassel discusses a new book on capital punishment by Boalt Hall law professor Franklin Zimring.\u00a0 Zimring traces both the cultural roots of the American death penalty, and its likely fate in the future.\u00a0 Cassel contends that the Bush Administration is out of step with the majority of Americans&#8217; death penalty views. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Aug. 01, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-louis-fishers-nazi-saboteurs-on-trial.html\" class=\"wauthor\">JOHN W. DEAN<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-louis-fishers-nazi-saboteurs-on-trial.html\" class=\"wtitle\">A Timely Account of the Key Supreme Court Military Tribunals Precedent: A Review of Louis Fisher&#8217;s Nazi Saboteurs on Trial \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw columnist, FindLaw book reviewer, and former counsel to the President John Dean assesses prolific author Louis Fisher&#8217;s most recent work, Nazi Saboteurs on Trial.\u00a0\u00a0 The book details the history behind Ex Parte Quirin, the key Supreme Court precedent upon which the Bush Administration has relied for the authority to convene military tribunals in the war on terrorism.\u00a0 Dean explains why the book&#8217;s lessons suggest Quirin may not be the type of precedent the Court ought to follow. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Jul. 25, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/did-lincoln-violate-the-constitution.html\" class=\"wauthor\">RODGER D. CITRON<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/did-lincoln-violate-the-constitution.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Did Lincoln Violate the Constitution?: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\"> A Review of Daniel Farber&#8217;s <u>Lincoln&#8217;s Constitution<\/u><\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Rodger Citron discusses a recent book by law professor Daniel Farber on two major constitution issues that arose during Abraham Lincoln&#8217;s Presidency.\u00a0 One is the basic question of the constitutionality &#8212; or lack thereof &#8212; of the South&#8217;s bid at secession.\u00a0 The other is the extent to which the President may assert expansive powers in wartime without running afoul of the Constitution. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Jul. 18, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-frank-partnoys-infectious-greed.html\" class=\"wauthor\">TOM TAULLI<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-frank-partnoys-infectious-greed.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Can Financial Instruments Become A Force For Evil? \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Frank Partnoy&#8217;s <u>Infectious Greed<\/u><\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book review and finance expert Tom Taulli reviews <u>Infectious Greed<\/u> by Frank Partnoy.\u00a0 In the book, Partnoy &#8212; a professor at San Diego Law School and previously a FindLaw guest columnist &#8212; argues that problems like the blowups of Enron, WorldCom, and Global Crossing are not isolated but systemic, symptoms of far larger issues with the financial markets.\u00a0 Taulli assesses Partnoy&#8217;s narrative of how derivatives, in particular, have destabilize the financial markets, and notes his proposals for reform. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Jul. 11, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-the-great-new-york-conspiracy.html\" class=\"wauthor\">MATTHREW HERRINGTON<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-the-great-new-york-conspiracy.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Salem-Like Trials In Colonial New York?: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of <u>The Great New York Conspiracy<\/u><\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Matthew Herrington discusses a recent historical work by Peter Charles Hoffer. The book focuses on a series of early American trials less well known than &#8212; but potentially as disturbing as &#8212; the Salem witch trials.\u00a0 These trials occurred in 1741, in colonial New York, and led to the execution of over three dozen people, most of whom were African-American slaves.\u00a0 <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Monday, Jul. 07, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-david-lipskys-absolutely-american.html\" class=\"wauthor\">SAM WILLIAMSON<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-david-lipskys-absolutely-american.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Showing West Point&#8217;s Virtues, But Glossing Its Flaws: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\"> A Review of David Lipsky&#8217;s Absolutely American<\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer, attorney, and former Marine Sam Williamson reviews Rolling Stone reporter David Lipsky&#8217;s Absolutely American &#8212; an account of life at West Point based on Lipsky&#8217;s four years of reportage there.\u00a0 Williamson finds much to appreciate in Lipsky&#8217;s account, and in West Point itself.\u00a0 But he faults the author for being too thoroughly seduced by an institution of which Lipsky first was skeptical, and then came to love. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Jun. 27, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-eric-altermans-what-liberal-media.html\" class=\"wauthor\">NEIL H. BUCHANAN<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-eric-altermans-what-liberal-media.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Proof Through Repetition and the &#8220;Liberal Bias&#8221; of the U.S. Media: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Eric Alterman&#8217;s What Liberal Media?<\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and future Rutgers law professor Neil Buchanan assesses Eric Alterman&#8217;s provocative recent book, <u>What Liberal Media?<\/u>\u00a0 Drawing on evidence from Iraq war coverage, Buchanan considers whether the media are biased in favor of liberalism, conservatism, money, power, or any or all of the above.\u00a0 <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Jun. 20, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-fareed-zakarias-the-future-of-freedom.html\" class=\"wauthor\">ELAINE CASSEL<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-fareed-zakarias-the-future-of-freedom.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Can Iraq Become a Liberal Democracy? \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\">And, Will American Remain One? A Review of Fareed Zakaria&#8217;s <u>The Future of Freedom<\/u><\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Elaine Cassel discusses Newsweek International Editor Fareed Zakaria&#8217;s recent book, <u>The Future of Freedom:\u00a0 Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad<\/u>.\u00a0 Along the way, Cassel raises two provocative questions about the application of Zakaria&#8217;s thesis: Can Iraq become not just a democracy, but a liberal democracy, with full civil liberties protections?\u00a0 And, is the U.S. still truly a liberal democracy despite recent incursions into civil liberties? <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Jun. 13, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-john-ferlings-new-book-on-the-pre-independence-decades.html\" class=\"wauthor\">G. J. RUSSELLO<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-john-ferlings-new-book-on-the-pre-independence-decades.html\" class=\"wtitle\">American Revolution, Reloaded: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of John Ferling&#8217;s New Book on the Pre-Independence Decades<\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and attorney G.J. Russello reviews a recent book on a less-discussed but crucial era in American history: the decades that preceded the Revolutionary War and the framing of the Consitution.\u00a0 Historian John Ferling&#8217;s A Leap in the Dark:\u00a0 The Struggle to Create the American Republic, as Russello explains, has a great deal to offer even to those readers already somewhat familiar with early American history. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Jun. 06, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-richard-a-posners-law-pragmatism-and-democracy.html\" class=\"wauthor\">PAUL HORWITZ<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-richard-a-posners-law-pragmatism-and-democracy.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Pragmatism and Its Consequences: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Richard A. Posner&#8217;s Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy<\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer, attorney, and visiting U. Iowa law school lecturer Paul Horwitz asseses federal judge and profilic author Richard Posner&#8217;s latest book.\u00a0 IN the book, Posner explicates his own theory of &#8220;common sense&#8221; pragmatism, and applies the theory to controversial Supreme Court cases such as <i>Bush v. Gore<\/i> and <i>Clinton v. Jones<\/i>. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, May. 30, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-rating-the-first-ladies.html\" class=\"wauthor\">LAURA HODES<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-rating-the-first-ladies.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Photo Ops, Public Images, and the Glare of the Press: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Rating the First Ladies<\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Laura Hodes&#8217;s reviews John B. Roberts&#8217;s recent book, Rating the First Ladies. In the course of her review, Hodes discusses important questions such as: What was the gap between various First Ladies&#8217; public and private images? How did First Ladies react to the advent of mass media, when presenting themselves to the public? Must a First Lady be ahead of her time when it comes to women&#8217;s rights? Must she restrict herself to being a hostess, or can she be a policymaker too? <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, May. 23, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-the-psychological-assessment-of-political-leaders.html\" class=\"wauthor\">MATTHEW HERRINGTON<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-the-psychological-assessment-of-political-leaders.html\" class=\"wtitle\">The Limited But Real Power of Power Psychology: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\"> A Review of <u>The Psychological Assessment of Political Leaders<\/u><\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Matthew Herrington evaluates a recent book by Jerrold Post, a former longtime CIA profiler, on psychological profiling in general, and the profiles of Hitler, Begin, Sadat, Clinton, and Saddam in particular.\u00a0 Herrington focuses on whether Saddam&#8217;s psychological profile was an accurate predictor of his actions during the recent war; and whether statistics and &#8220;hard&#8221; science are useful in profiling. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, May. 16, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-lewis-goulds-recent-book-on-the-modern-presidency.html\" class=\"wauthor\">RODGER CITRON<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-lewis-goulds-recent-book-on-the-modern-presidency.html\" class=\"wtitle\">The Pros And Cons Of The Continuous Campaign: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review Of Lewis Gould&#8217;s Recent Book On The Modern Presidency<\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Rodger Citron evaluates U. Texas historian Lewis Gould&#8217;s recently-published The Modern American Presidency.\u00a0 Citron praises Gould&#8217;s descriptive powers, but finds faults with his suggestions for reforming the presidency. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, May. 09, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-life-of-justice-douglas.html\" class=\"wauthor\">TOM TAULLI<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-life-of-justice-douglas.html\" class=\"wtitle\">The Life of Justice Douglas: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\">Bruce Murphy&#8217;s Biography, <u>Wild Bill<\/u><\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and corporate finance expert Tom Taulli reviews a recent biography of one of the Supreme Court&#8217;s greatest characters, Justice William O. Douglas, by accomplished Court scribe Bruce Murphy.\u00a0 As Taulli discusses, Douglas&#8217;s life and his legend were often out of sync, but both are fascinating. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, May. 02, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-robert-kagans-of-paradise-and-power.html\" class=\"wauthor\">ANTHONY DWORKIN<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-robert-kagans-of-paradise-and-power.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Are Americans Really from Mars, and Europeans From Venus?: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\"> A Review of Robert Kagan&#8217;s Of Paradise and Power<\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and Crimes of War website editor Anthony Dworkin reviews Robert Kagan&#8217;s recent book on the differences between modern American and European points of view regarding the use of force and the importance of international law. Dworkin finds Kagan&#8217;s argument clever but ultimately unconvincing &#8211; especially as it applies to the European\/American split on the Iraq war. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Apr. 25, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-anthony-swoffords-jarhead.html\" class=\"wauthor\">SAM WILLIAMSON<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-anthony-swoffords-jarhead.html\" class=\"wtitle\">A Skewed View of Life in the Marines: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Anthony Swofford&#8217;s <u>Jarhead<\/u><\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer, attorney and ex-Marine Sam Williamson reviews ex-Marine Anthony Swofford&#8217;s memoir Jarhead. Swofford tells of his experiences both training with his platoon, and during the Gulf War. Williamson takes him to task for leaving out many positive aspects of the experience of being a Marine. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Apr. 18, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-amy-chuas-world-on-fire.html\" class=\"wauthor\">PETER LURIE<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-amy-chuas-world-on-fire.html\" class=\"wtitle\">A Problematic New View On Why They Hate Us, And What to Do About It: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Amy Chua&#8217;s World on Fire<\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Peter Lurie reviews Yale law professor Amy Chua&#8217;s recent book on the roots of anti-American hatred. Chua&#8217;s thesis is that anti-Americanism is the result of &#8220;the three most powerful forces operating in the world today: markets, democracy, and ethnic hatred&#8221;; she also makes some policy prescriptions to remedy the situation. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Apr. 11, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-justice-at-dachau-the-trials-of-an-american-prosecutor.html\" class=\"wauthor\">MARK S. ZAID<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-justice-at-dachau-the-trials-of-an-american-prosecutor.html\" class=\"wtitle\">On The Judicial Front Lines In Post-World War II Germany: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Justice At Dachau: The Trials Of An American Prosecutor<\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Mark Zaid discusses the story of the American prosecutor, thirty-two-year-old &#8220;country lawyer&#8221; William Denson, who procured convictions in a set of lesser known, but important, post-World War II Nazi prosecutions. Denson handled prosecutions of war crimes committed at the concentration camps at Dachau, Mauthausen, Flossenburg and Buchenwald. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Apr. 04, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-judith-richards-hopes-pinstripes-and-pearls.html\" class=\"wauthor\">JOANNA GROSSMAN<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-judith-richards-hopes-pinstripes-and-pearls.html\" class=\"wtitle\">The Women of Harvard Law&#8217;s Class of &#8217;64: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Judith Richards Hope&#8217;s Pinstripes and Pearls<\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw columnist and book reviewer, and Hofstra law professor, Joanna Grossman reviews attorney Judith Richards Hope&#8217;s book on the lives of the fifteen women in Harvard Law School&#8217;s class of 1964. Grossman applauds the book as a historical account, but finds it falls short as an interesting narrative, for several reasons. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Mar. 28, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-bernard-bailyns-to-begin-the-world-anew.html\" class=\"wauthor\">MATT HERRINGTON<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-bernard-bailyns-to-begin-the-world-anew.html\" class=\"wtitle\">The Framers as Idealistic, Pragmatic and Helpfully Parochial: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Bernard Bailyn&#8217;s To Begin the World Anew<\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Matt Herrington assesses the latest book by acclaimed historian Bernard Bailyn &#8212; an essay collection addressing the reasons behind the genius of the U.S. Constitution&#8217;s Framers. Herrington explains how Bailyn&#8217;s cross-disciplinary approach yields new insights about the Framers, and continues the thread of the argument first introduced in Bailyn&#8217;s 1960&#8217;s classic The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Mar. 21, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-robert-h-borks-coercing-virtue.html\" class=\"wauthor\">PAUL HORWITZ<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-robert-h-borks-coercing-virtue.html\" class=\"wtitle\">A Conspiracy of Judges?: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Robert H. Bork&#8217;s Coercing Virtue<\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Paul Horwitz finds a grain of truth, but also a lack of balance, in former judge and failed Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork&#8217;s latest book, Coercing Virtue: The Worldwide Rule of Judges. Focusing on the Supreme Court of the U.S., Canada, and Israel, and taking on international law as well, Bork contends that in these nations and elsewhere, a &#8220;New Class&#8221; of liberals is imposing its values through the judicial branch. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Mar. 14, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-michael-welchs-detained.html\" class=\"wauthor\">ELAINE CASSEL<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-michael-welchs-detained.html\" class=\"wtitle\">American&#8217;s Troubled-and Troubling-Policies Toward Immigrants: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Michael Welch&#8217;s Detained<\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer, attorney, and author Elaine Cassel weighs in on Rutgers criminal justice professor Michael Welch&#8217;s provocative assessment of historical and current laws relating to immigrants, Detained: Immigration Laws and the Expanding I.N.S. Jail Complex. Cassel explains the relevant laws and regulations, both predating and postdating 9\/11, and assesses the conclusions Welch draws. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Mar. 07, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-michal-belknaps-the-vietnam-war-on-trial.html\" class=\"wauthor\">JOANNE MARINER<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-michal-belknaps-the-vietnam-war-on-trial.html\" class=\"wtitle\">The Lessons of My Lai: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Michal Belknap&#8217;s The Vietnam War on Trial <\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and human rights attorney Joanne Mariner assesses a recent book on the My Lai massacre and the subsequent prosecution of Lieutenant William Calley. Mariner notes that, with war on Iraq apparently impending, the book&#8217;s lessons on the difficulty of distinguishing civilians from soldiers in the context of battle, and some officers&#8217; indifference to doing so, may be relevant today as well. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Feb. 28, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-stuart-eizenstats-imperfect-justice.html\" class=\"wauthor\">ANITA RAMASASTRY<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-stuart-eizenstats-imperfect-justice.html\" class=\"wtitle\">A Review of Stuart Eizenstat&#8217;s Imperfect Justice, An Inside Account of the Holocaust Restitution Efforts of the 1990s \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and U. Washington law professor Anita Ramasastry reviews former Clinton Administration official Stuart Eizenstat&#8217;s new memoir about the people (including Eizenstat himself) who created the Holocaust restitution settlements. As Ramasastry notes, Eizenstat gives a fascinating insider&#8217;s view of a process filled with disputes, and plagued by political obstacles, that nonetheless ended in striking success. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Feb. 21, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-john-grishams-latest-legal-thriller.html\" class=\"wauthor\">SAM WILLIAMSON<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-john-grishams-latest-legal-thriller.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Why The King of Torts Comes Up Short: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of John Grisham&#8217;s Latest Legal Thriller<\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Sam Williamson was less than thrilled with John Grisham&#8217;s most recent legal thriller, The King of Torts. Williamson explains why, in his view, the novel&#8217;s plot is weak, and its over-the-top grudge against plaintiffs&#8217; lawyers is plain. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Feb. 14, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-a-new-book-on-the-effectiveness-of-gun-control.html\" class=\"wauthor\">BARTON ARONSON<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-a-new-book-on-the-effectiveness-of-gun-control.html\" class=\"wtitle\">The Brady Bill and Beyond: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of a New Book on the Effectiveness of Gun Control<\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw columnist and book reviewer Barton Aronson reviews James Jacobs&#8217;s new book Can Gun Control Work? Jacobs asks this provocative question: How can gun control work, given that Americans don&#8217;t favor giving up guns, and that so far, banning only some guns, and regulating only some gun sales, hasn&#8217;t worked very well? Jacobs has some suggestions, and so does Aronson. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Feb. 07, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-thomas-pattersons-the-vanishing-voter.html\" class=\"wauthor\">MATTHEW HERRINGTON<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-thomas-pattersons-the-vanishing-voter.html\" class=\"wtitle\">Insights Into General Elections, and A Prescription for Improving Primaries: \n                <br>\n                <span style=\"font-size: 12px\">A Review of Thomas Patterson&#8217;s The Vanishing Voter<\/span> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and attoreny Matthew Herrington assesses a new book by Thomas E. Patterson that compiles and comments on a massive set of recent data on declining American voting rates. The book, and the review, weigh in on important questions such as: How much has the voting rate fallen, and why? Do voting rates really matter, and if so, why? What, if anything, can be done to combat falling voting rates? Are primaries important and if so, how can they be made more relevant? <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Jan. 31, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/was-september-11-2001-actually-a-prelude-to-1984.html\" class=\"wauthor\">MARK S. ZAID<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/was-september-11-2001-actually-a-prelude-to-1984.html\" class=\"wtitle\">WAS SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 ACTUALLY A PRELUDE TO 1984?: \n                <br>\n                A REVIEW OF A NEW BOOK FORECASTING THE POSSIBLE RISE OF A NATIONAL SECURITY STATE \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Mark Zaid reviews former U. Baltimore law professor C. Williams Michaels&#8217;s new book, No Greater Threat: America After September 11 And The Rise Of A National Security State. How can we tell if the U.S. is indeed becoming more of a national security state than a free country? Zaid explains Michaels&#8217;s criteria, and assesses his reasons for believing America is sacrificing too much freedom in the name of security. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Jan. 24, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-doug-isenbergs-internet-law-guide.html\" class=\"wauthor\">LAURA HODES<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-doug-isenbergs-internet-law-guide.html\" class=\"wtitle\">SENSIBLE ADVICE FOR BEGINNERS ON A SLIPPERY LEGAL SUBJECT: \n                <br>\n                A REVIEW OF DOUG ISENBERG&#8217;S INTERNET LAW GUIDE \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Laura Hodes weighs in on attorney Doug Isenberg&#8217;s new Internet law guide. Hodes contends that the guide will work well for its intended audience &#8212; those who seek to make a preliminary assessment of their sites&#8217; liability risks &#8212; but is no substitute for a good lawyer. She also takes issue with some of its decisions as to what, and what not, to cover. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Jan. 17, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-invisible-punishment-an-essay-collection.html\" class=\"wauthor\">ELAINE CASSEL<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-invisible-punishment-an-essay-collection.html\" class=\"wtitle\">WHEN SERVING TIME IS NOT ENOUGH: \n                <br>\n                A REVIEW OF INVISIBLE PUNISHMENT, AN ESSAY COLLECTION ABOUT THE RESULTS OF THE U.S.&#8217;S HIGH INCARCERATION RATE \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer Elaine Cassel reviews an essay collection regarding the consequences of the U.S.&#8217;s extremely high per capita incarceration rate. Cassel, and the essay collection, take on a number of provocative questions related to this topic, including what this incarceration rate means for prisoners, their families, and society; and why Finland has dramatically reduced its once-similar rate, yet we have not. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Jan. 10, 2003<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-carol-berkins-recent-book-on-the-constitutional-convention-of-1787.html\" class=\"wauthor\">G.J. RUSSELLO<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-carol-berkins-recent-book-on-the-constitutional-convention-of-1787.html\" class=\"wtitle\">AN OFT-TOLD TALE, TOLD WELL: \n                <br>\n                A REVIEW OF CAROL BERKIN&#8217;S RECENT BOOK ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION OF 1787 \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Gerald J. Russello discusses a recent book on the Constitution&#8217;s framing, A Brilliant Solution, authored by CUNY\/Baruch College history professor Carol Berkin. As Russello explains, Berkin demonstrates that the form the Constitution, as we know it, took, was hardly a foregone conclusion at the Constitutional Convention. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Dec. 13, 2002<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-george-fletchers-romantics-at-war.html\" class=\"wauthor\">MATT HERRINGTON<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-george-fletchers-romantics-at-war.html\" class=\"wtitle\">HOW DOES THE LAW OF WAR APPLY WHEN TERRORISM IS PREVALENT? \n                <br>\n                A REVIEW OF GEORGE FLETCHER&#8217;S &#8220;ROMANTICS AT WAR&#8221; \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Matt Herrington reviews Columbia law professor (and FindLaw guest columnist) George Fletcher&#8217;s recent book, Romantics At War. Romantics at War discusses, among other topics, military tribunals, &#8220;unlawful combatants,&#8221; Nuremberg, the German saboteur case on which the Bush Administration has heavily relied, and the general question of how the laws of war have adapted (or not adapted) to the modern world, with its concept of &#8220;war crimes,&#8221; and its persistent problems with terrorism. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Dec. 06, 2002<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-judge-john-t-noonans-narrowing-the-nations-power.html\" class=\"wauthor\">ELAINE CASSEL<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-judge-john-t-noonans-narrowing-the-nations-power.html\" class=\"wtitle\">EXPANDING STATES&#8217; RIGHTS AT THE COST OF FEDERAL LAW GUARANTEES: \n                <br>\n                A REVIEW OF JUDGE JOHN T. NOONAN&#8217;S NARROWING THE NATION&#8217;S POWER: THE SUPREME COURT SIDES WITH THE STATES \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer, attorney, and author Elaine Cassel reviews a recent book by John T. Noonan, Jr., an emeritus Boalt Hall law professor and judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Noonan takes aim at the Supreme Court&#8217;s federalism jurisprudence relating to both the Eleventh and Fourteenth Amendments. In her review, Cassel explains how the Amendments intersect, and notes how Noonan&#8217;s critique may relate to an upcoming Supreme Court case. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Nov. 22, 2002<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-attorney-martin-garbuss-courting-disaster.html\" class=\"wauthor\">KEVIN J. DOYLE<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-attorney-martin-garbuss-courting-disaster.html\" class=\"wtitle\">A VETERAN LIBERAL TRIAL LAWYER&#8217;S VIEW OF THE HIGH COURT: \n                <br>\n                A REVIEW OF ATTORNEY MARTIN GARBUS&#8217;S <u>COURTING DISASTER<\/u> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and freelance writer Kevin Doyle weighs in on highly respected New York attorney Martin Garbus&#8217;s recent book on the Supreme Court. Garbus covers a number of different areas of the Court&#8217;s jurisprudence, and offers a frank polemic explaining why &#8212; from a liberal&#8217;s point of view &#8212; the current Court has gone off-track. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Nov. 15, 2002<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-final-days-of-the-enron-meltdown.html\" class=\"wauthor\">TOM TAULLI<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-final-days-of-the-enron-meltdown.html\" class=\"wtitle\">THE FINAL DAYS OF THE ENRON MELTDOWN: \n                <br>\n                A REVIEW OF ANATOMY OF GREED, A YOUNG MBA&#8217;S INSIDER TELL-ALL \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and USC Marshall School finance professor Tom Taulli discusses a new Enron expose: Anatomy of Greed: The Unshredded Truth from an Enron Insider. The expose, authored by young MBA Brian Cruver, offers a ground-level view of how employees experienced Enron&#8217;s implosion &#8212; as well as providing context from the company&#8217;s history. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Nov. 08, 2002<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-underappreciated-grover-cleveland.html\" class=\"wauthor\">G.J. RUSSELLO<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/the-underappreciated-grover-cleveland.html\" class=\"wtitle\">THE UNDERAPPRECIATED GROVER CLEVELAND: \n                <br>\n                A NEW BIOGRAPHY DEMONSTRATES WHY HE&#8217;S MORE THAN A FOOTNOTE TO HISTORY \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> Is former President Grover Cleveland now no more than an obscure Trivial Pursuit answer? Not at all, argues FindLaw book reviewer and attorney G.J. Russello. Russello assesses a recent Cleveland biography by Henry Graff that illustrates why Cleveland&#8217;s Presidential years were actually among the most interesting in American history. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Nov. 01, 2002<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-scott-turows-reversible-errors.html\" class=\"wauthor\">SAM WILLIAMSON<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-scott-turows-reversible-errors.html\" class=\"wtitle\">WHY SCOTT TUROW&#8217;S NEW NOVEL WILL APPEAL TO BOTH LEGAL GEEKS AND A MORE GENERAL AUDIENCE: \n                <br>\n                A REVIEW OF REVERSIBLE ERRORS \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Sam Williamson assesses Scott Turow&#8217;s latest novel &#8212; Reversible Errors, which tells a number of interwoven stories related to a death penalty prisoner&#8217;s last chance at reversing his fate. Williamson discusses the novel in the context of Turow&#8217;s past work, placing it on the spectrum ranging from works about society such as &#8220;Laws of Our Fathers&#8221; to works about law such as &#8220;Personal Injuries.&#8221; <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Oct. 25, 2002<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-lawrence-schillers-new-true-litigation-book-cape-may-court-house-a-death-in-the-night.html\" class=\"wauthor\">MATTHEW HERRINGTON<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-lawrence-schillers-new-true-litigation-book-cape-may-court-house-a-death-in-the-night.html\" class=\"wtitle\">CLIENTS BEHAVING BADLY: \n                <br>\n                A REVIEW OF LAWRENCE SCHILLER&#8217;S NEW &#8220;TRUE LITIGATION&#8221; BOOK, CAPE MAY COURT HOUSE: A DEATH IN THE NIGHT \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Matthew Herrington reviews Lawrence Schiller&#8217;s new &#8220;true litigation&#8221; account of a suspicious car accident, which led to a civil suit, which led to further investigation of a possible murder. Herrington contends that, in addition to offering a fascinating narrative, the book also illuminates a major mistake that plaintiffs frequently make, and that lawyers should be careful to counsel against. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Oct. 18, 2002<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-terrorism-and-the-constitution.html\" class=\"wauthor\">ELAINE CASSEL<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-terrorism-and-the-constitution.html\" class=\"wtitle\">ANTI-TERRORISM&#8217;S LENGTHY HISTORY AND CURRENT ABUSES: \n                <br>\n                A REVIEW OF TERRORISM AND THE CONSTITUTION \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer Elaine Cassel discusses a new book on contemporary and past U.S. efforts to combat &#8220;terrorism&#8221; and the legal abuses that have resulted. The work, by Georgetown law professor David Cole and Jamex X. Dempsey of the Center for Democracy and Technology, has been updated to include material not only on the 1996 Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, but also on the post 9\/11 USA PATRIOT Act. Cassel contends that the book may portend poorly for hopes that federal courts will intervene to check anti-terror legal measures. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Oct. 11, 2002<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/for-judges-and-clerks-the-song-remains-the-same.html\" class=\"wauthor\">PAUL HORWITZ<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/for-judges-and-clerks-the-song-remains-the-same.html\" class=\"wtitle\">FOR JUDGES AND CLERKS, THE SONG REMAINS THE SAME: \n                <br>\n                A REVIEW OF THE FORGOTTEN MEMOIR OF JOHN KNOX, A SUPREME COURT CLERK&#8217;S ACCOUNT OF HIS 1936-37 CLERKSHIP \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> What was it like to clerk for one of the &#8220;Four Horsemen&#8221; &#8212; the four Supreme Court Justices whose resistance to the New Deal almost led FDR to pack the Court? As FindLaw book reviewer and attorney Paul Horwitz explains, we can now get the answer right from the horse&#8217;s mouth (as it were), for a long-forgotten clerk tell-all has been rescued and published at the behest of two legal scholars. Horwitz assesses clerk John Knox&#8217;s account, and explains why by the end of his clerkship, Knox took to referring to his Justice as &#8220;that bastard.&#8221; <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Oct. 4, 2002<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-you-may-not-tie-an-alligator-to-a-fire-hydrant.html\" class=\"wauthor\">ADAM FREEDMAN<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/a-review-of-you-may-not-tie-an-alligator-to-a-fire-hydrant.html\" class=\"wtitle\">DUMB LAWS FOR IDIOTS: \n                <br>\n                A REVIEW OF YOU MAY NOT TIE AN ALLIGATOR TO A FIRE HYDRANT \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw book reviewer, attorney, and New York Law Journal columnist Adam Freedman offers a humorous review of a humorous collection of &#8220;101 Real Dumb Laws.&#8221; Freedman notes, however, that some of the laws aren&#8217;t so dumb, and some of the characterizations of the laws aren&#8217;t so real &#8212; for example, there isn&#8217;t actually any law against tying an alligator to a fire hydrant, it turns out. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Sep. 27, 2002<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/naming-genocide.html\" class=\"wauthor\">JOANNE MARINER<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/naming-genocide.html\" class=\"wtitle\">NAMING GENOCIDE: \n                <br>\n                A REVIEW OF SAMANTHA POWER&#8217;S <u>A PROBLEM FROM HELL<\/u> \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw columnist and human rights attorney Joanne Mariner reviews Samantha Power&#8217;s book &#8220;A Problem from Hell&#8221;: America and the Age of Genocide. Power argues that U.S. authorities repeatedly failed to take needed action to stop mass slaughter, and shows how their reluctance to use the term &#8220;genocide&#8221; for situations like Rwanda&#8217;s was connected to their inaction. \u00a0Power also contends that officials ignored warning signs of genocide, exaggerated the dangers of confronting the situation, and minimized proof of the crime. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Tuesday, Sep. 24, 2002<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n        <\/p><table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" border=\"0\">\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\" align=\"left\" nowrap>\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/was-churchstate-separation-part-of-the-original-constitution.html\" class=\"wauthor\">MARCI HAMILTON<\/a> \n            <\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n          <tr>\n            <td valign=\"middle\">\n              <a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/was-churchstate-separation-part-of-the-original-constitution.html\" class=\"wtitle\">WAS CHURCH\/STATE SEPARATION PART OF THE ORIGINAL CONSTITUTION? \n                <br>\n                A REVIEW OF PHILIP HAMBURGER&#8217;S PROVOCATIVE RECENT BOOK ON SEPARATION&#8217;S HISTORY \n            <\/a><\/td>\n          <\/tr>\n        <\/table>\n        <span class=\"smalltext\"> FindLaw columnist and book reviewer and Cardozo law professor Marci Hamilton reviews Professor Philip Hamburger&#8217;s recent book, The Separation of Church and State. Hamilton finds much in the book to admire, including the strong evidence it adduces to support a fascinating thesis about American history. She cautions, however, that the work may be susceptible to misuse by those who deny that church\/state separation is an integral part of the Constitution, and seek a far closer relationship between the two. <\/span> \n        <br>\n        <span class=\"smalltext-gray\">Friday, Sep. 20, 2002<\/span> \n        <br>\n        <p>\n<!-- END PAST REVIEWS SEGMENT -->\n      <\/p><\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td colspan=\"2\" height=\"25\" align=\"left\">\n        \u00a0Most Recent | <a class=\"contrib\" href=\"\/legal-commentary\/book-reviews-by-title-7.html\">Page 7<\/a> | <a class=\"contrib\" href=\"\/legal-commentary\/book-reviews-by-title-6.html\">Page 6<\/a> | <a class=\"contrib\" href=\"\/legal-commentary\/book-reviews-by-title-5.html\">Page 5<\/a> | <a class=\"contrib\" href=\"\/legal-commentary\/book-reviews-by-title-4.html\">Page 4<\/a> | <a class=\"contrib\" href=\"\/legal-commentary\/book-reviews-by-title-3.html\">Page 3<\/a> | <a class=\"contrib\" href=\"\/legal-commentary\/book-reviews-by-title-2.html\">Page 2<\/a> | <a class=\"contrib\" href=\"\/legal-commentary\/book-reviews-by-title-1.html\">Page 1<\/a>\u00a0\u00a0 \n\n<p>\n<!-- MIDDLE AD PLACEHOLDER -->\n      <\/p><\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr valign=\"top\" align=\"center\">\n      <td colspan=\"2\">\n\n        &#8212; \n      <\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"was-this-helpful\">\n    <div\n            class=\"was-this-helpful__question-container\"\n            aria-labelledby=\"was-this-helpful__question\"\n            role=\"group\"\n    >\n        <span\n                id=\"was-this-helpful__question\"\n                class=\"was-this-helpful__question fl-text-lg-bold\"\n        >Was this helpful?<\/span>\n        <button\n                class=\"was-this-helpful__button fl-text-sm\"\n                aria-label=\"Yes\"\n                value=\"yes\"\n        >\n            <span class=\"was-this-helpful__button-text fl-text-bold\">Yes<\/span>\n            <i class=\"was-this-helpful__button-icon\">\n                <svg width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"none\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\">\n                    <g id=\"thumbs-up\" clip-path=\"url(#clip0_604_3418)\">\n                        <path id=\"Vector\"\n                              d=\"M6 21H3C2.46957 21 1.96086 20.7893 1.58579 20.4142C1.21071 20.0391 1 19.5304 1 19V12C1 11.4696 1.21071 10.9609 1.58579 10.5858C1.96086 10.2107 2.46957 10 3 10H6M13 8V4C13 3.20435 12.6839 2.44129 12.1213 1.87868C11.5587 1.31607 10.7956 1 10 1L6 10V21H17.28C17.7623 21.0055 18.2304 20.8364 18.5979 20.524C18.9654 20.2116 19.2077 19.7769 19.28 19.3L20.66 10.3C20.7035 10.0134 20.6842 9.72068 20.6033 9.44225C20.5225 9.16382 20.3821 8.90629 20.1919 8.68751C20.0016 8.46873 19.7661 8.29393 19.5016 8.17522C19.2371 8.0565 18.9499 7.99672 18.66 8H13Z\"\n                              stroke=\"#666666\" stroke-width=\"2\" stroke-linecap=\"round\"\n                              stroke-linejoin=\"round\"><\/path>\n                    <\/g>\n                    <defs>\n                        <clipPath id=\"clip0_604_3418\">\n                            <rect width=\"22\" height=\"22\" fill=\"white\"><\/rect>\n                        <\/clipPath>\n                    <\/defs>\n                <\/svg>\n            <\/i>\n        <\/button>\n        <button\n                class=\"was-this-helpful__button fl-text-sm\"\n                aria-label=\"No\"\n                value=\"no\"\n        >\n            <span class=\"was-this-helpful__button-text fl-text-bold\">No<\/span>\n            <i class=\"was-this-helpful__button-icon\">\n                <svg width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"none\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\">\n                    <g id=\"thumbs-down\" clip-path=\"url(#clip0_604_3423)\">\n                        <path id=\"Vector\"\n                              d=\"M16 0.999995H18.67C19.236 0.989986 19.7859 1.18813 20.2154 1.55681C20.645 1.9255 20.9242 2.43905 21 3V10C20.9242 10.5609 20.645 11.0745 20.2154 11.4432C19.7859 11.8119 19.236 12.01 18.67 12H16M9.00003 14V18C9.00003 18.7956 9.3161 19.5587 9.87871 20.1213C10.4413 20.6839 11.2044 21 12 21L16 12V0.999995H4.72003C4.2377 0.994543 3.76965 1.16359 3.40212 1.47599C3.0346 1.78839 2.79235 2.22309 2.72003 2.7L1.34003 11.7C1.29652 11.9866 1.31586 12.2793 1.39669 12.5577C1.47753 12.8362 1.61793 13.0937 1.80817 13.3125C1.99842 13.5313 2.23395 13.7061 2.49846 13.8248C2.76297 13.9435 3.05012 14.0033 3.34003 14H9.00003Z\"\n                              stroke=\"#666666\" stroke-width=\"2\" stroke-linecap=\"round\" stroke-linejoin=\"round\"\/>\n                    <\/g>\n                    <defs>\n                        <clipPath id=\"clip0_604_3423\">\n                            <rect width=\"22\" height=\"22\" fill=\"white\"\/>\n                        <\/clipPath>\n                    <\/defs>\n                <\/svg>\n            <\/i>\n        <\/button>\n    <\/div>\n    <span class=\"was-this-helpful__taken-action fl-text-sm-bold\"><\/span>\n    <div class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-container\">\n        <div class=\"was-this-helpful__choose-option-message\" role=\"status\">\n            <p class=\"was-this-helpful__choose-option-message-text\"><\/p>\n        <\/div>\n        <form class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-form\">\n            <div class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback was-this-helpful__feedback--positive\">\n                <fieldset>\n                    <legend class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\" tabindex=\"0\">Why was this helpful?<\/legend>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--understandable\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"positive-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Easy to understand\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--understandable\"\n                        >Easy to understand<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--solved-problem\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"positive-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Solved my problem\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--solved-problem\"\n                        >Solved my problem<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--other\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"positive-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Other\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--other\"\n                        >Other<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                <\/fieldset>\n            <\/div>\n            <div class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback was-this-helpful__feedback--negative\">\n                <fieldset>\n                    <legend class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\" tabindex=\"0\">Why was this not helpful?<\/legend>\n                    <div class=\"was-this-helpful__choose-option-message\" role=\"status\">\n                        <p class=\"was-this-helpful__choose-option-message-text\"><\/p>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--missing-info\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"negative-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Missing Information\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--missing-info\"\n                        >Missing the information I need<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--complicated\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"negative-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Too complicated\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--complicated\"\n                        >Too complicated \/ too many steps<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--dated\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"negative-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Out of date\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--dated\"\n                        >Out of date<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--negative-other\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"negative-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Other\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--negative-other\"\n                        >Other<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                <\/fieldset>\n            <\/div>\n            <div class=\"was-this-helpful__form-buttons-container\">\n                <button\n                    class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-button was-this-helpful__feedback-button--positive at-feedback-submit fl-button secondary\"\n                    type=\"submit\"\n                >\n                    <span class=\"fl-button-content\">Submit<\/span>\n                    <i\n                        class=\"fa fa-angle-right medium\"\n                        aria-hidden=\"true\"\n                    ><\/i>\n                <\/button>\n                <button\n                    class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-button was-this-helpful__feedback-button--cancel fl-button primary disabled\"\n                    type=\"reset\"\n                >\n                    <span class=\"fl-button-content\">Cancel<\/span>\n                    <i\n                        class=\"fa fa-times-circle medium\"\n                        aria-hidden=\"true\"\n                    ><\/i>\n                <\/button>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/form>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"was-this-helpful__thank-you-message\" role=\"status\">\n        <i class=\"was-this-helpful__thank-you-message-icon fa fa-check\"><\/i>\n        <p class=\"was-this-helpful__thank-you-message-text\" aria-live=\"polite\"><\/p>\n    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n    <\/div>\n    \n    <div class=\"fl-block-column fl-section-sidebar\">\n        \n    <\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"parent":49876,"menu_order":0,"template":"app\/Http\/Controllers\/Templates\/ArticlePageController.php","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_stopmodifiedupdate":false,"_modified_date":"","_cloudinary_featured_overwrite":false},"class_list":["post-50458","supreme","type-supreme","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/supreme.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/supreme\/50458","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/supreme.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/supreme"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/supreme.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/supreme"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/supreme.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/supreme\/49876"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/supreme.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50458"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}