{"id":54476,"date":"2016-09-30T11:27:00","date_gmt":"2016-09-30T16:27:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/content.findlaw-admin.com\/ability-legal\/supreme\/legal-commentary\/who-killed-the-living-constitution.html"},"modified":"2016-09-30T11:27:00","modified_gmt":"2016-09-30T16:27:00","slug":"who-killed-the-living-constitution","status":"publish","type":"supreme","link":"https:\/\/supreme.findlaw.com\/legal-commentary\/who-killed-the-living-constitution.html","title":{"rendered":"Who Killed the &#8220;Living Constitution&#8221;?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-9d6595d7  fl-block-columns fl-sectionWithSidebar fl-container fl-flex fl-flex-wrap fl-gap30\">\n    \n    <div class=\"fl-page-articles   fl-block-column fl-section-main fl-section-main-full-width\">\n        <div class=\"yui-g\" id=\"leftcol-module\">\n\n      <!-- Right Line of Links Section -->\n\n      <!-- BEGIN PICTURE INSERTION -->\n\n\n      <!-- BEGIN TITLE AND AUTHOR INSERTION -->\n\n      <table>\n\n        <tr>\n\n\n\n          <td width=\"100\" rowspan=\"3\" class=\"wiauthor\"><a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/michael-dorf-archive\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https://supreme.findlaw.com/static/f/images\/writ\/michael.dorf.jpg\" border=\"0\"><\/a><\/td>\n\n          <td class=\"wititle\"><h1>Who Killed the &#8220;Living Constitution&#8221;? <\/h1><\/td>\n        <\/tr>\n        <tr>\n          <td class=\"wiauthor\"><a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/michael-dorf-archive\" class=\"graybold\"><h2>By MICHAEL C. DORF<\/h2><\/a><\/td>\n        <\/tr>\n        <tr>\n          <td class=\"widate\">Monday, Mar. 10, 2008<\/td>\n\n        <\/tr>\n      <\/table>\n      <span class=\"smalltext\">\n\n\n<p>In <b>a widely reported speech<\/b> at the University of Central Missouri (UCM) last week, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia told his audience that the &#8220;living Constitution&#8221; is bad for democracy. Scalia has poked fun at the living Constitution many times before, even suggesting, jokingly, that he prefers the &#8220;dead Constitution.&#8221; But the substantial publicity that Scalia&#8217;s UCM speech generated&#8211;not to mention a looming Presidential election in which judicial appointments will likely play some significant role&#8211;makes this a fitting moment to examine the claims for and against the living Constitution.<\/p> <p>In this column, I shall argue that the living Constitution is a problematic metaphor, but only because originalists like Justice Scalia either misunderstand or mischaracterize what it stands for.<\/p> <div id=\"writthreetwenty\">\n<script language=\"Javascript\">dart_call(\"300x250\", \"ptile=2\", 0); <\/script><\/div>\n<p><b>What a Metaphor is For<\/b><\/p> <p>According to the press reports of his UCM speech, at one point Justice Scalia compared judges and lawyers who champion the &#8220;living Constitution&#8221; to stockbrokers who tout stocks by saying that recent poor performance simply means that the markets are resting before they begin to climb again. &#8220;Get real,&#8221; Scalia said.  &#8220;The stock market is not a mountain climber, and the Constitution is not a living organism. . . . It&#8217;s a legal document.&#8221;<\/p> <p>Well, duh. Nobody thinks that the Constitution is <u>literally<\/u> a living organism in the way that a person, a dog, or a tree is. Attempts to feed or water the document in the National Archives would simply damage a precious relic.<\/p> <p>When Justice Scalia&#8217;s hypothetical stockbroker talks about the markets &#8220;resting,&#8221; he is speaking metaphorically, just as champions of the living Constitution speak metaphorically. In the former case, we can sensibly ask whether the metaphor of markets as mountain climbers catching their breath is an instructive one. Do the aggregated actions of millions of individual investors work <u>as though<\/u> they were a mountain climber, and in what respects? Maybe the mountain climber is a bad metaphor, but if so, that must be because there are key differences between mountain climbers and markets that the metaphor obscures. Simply pointing out that a market is not a mountain climber is unhelpful.<\/p> <p>Likewise, we should ask: Is a living organism a good metaphor for the Constitution, or a bad metaphor for it? To answer that question, we might want to know what is meant by the &#8220;living Constitution&#8221; in the first place.<b><\/b><\/p> <p><b>The Living Constitution in American Jurisprudence<\/b><\/p> <p>The Supreme Court itself rarely uses the precise term &#8220;living Constitution.&#8221; Its most significant invocation in recent memory was in the 1980 case of <b><i><a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/\" rel=\"noopener\">Rummel v. Estelle<\/a><\/i><\/b>. There, a majority of the Court rejected a claim that a sentence of life imprisonment for a third-time non-violent recidivist amounted to cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. In a dissent that relied on contemporary notions of proportionality (that is, the idea that the punishment should, at least roughly, fit the crime), Justice Lewis Powell, joined by Justices William Brennan, Thurgood Marshall, and John Paul Stevens, stated that the Court&#8217;s job was to construe &#8220;a living Constitution.&#8221; Powell equated a &#8220;cruel and unusual punishment&#8221; with a punishment that, in his estimation, &#8220;virtually every layman and lawyer&#8221; would regard &#8220;as grossly unjust&#8221; in light of the crime committed.<\/p> <!-- MIDDLE AD PLACEHOLDER -->\n<p>If the exact phrase &#8220;living Constitution&#8221; is a rarity in the Supreme Court&#8217;s precedents, however, similar language abounds therein. For example, in a 1988 case involving a student newspaper, <b><i><a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/\" rel=\"noopener\">Hazelwood School Dist. v. Kuhlmeier<\/a><\/i><\/b>, Justice Brennan&#8217;s dissent&#8211;joined by Justice Marshall and Justice Harry Blackmun&#8211;approvingly quoted a lower court decision to the effect &#8220;that our <a name=\"SR;12399\"><\/a>Constitution is a <a name=\"SR;12402\"><\/a>living reality, not parchment preserved under glass.&#8221;<\/p> <p>Nor did biological metaphors for the Constitution first come into being only in the late Twentieth Century.<i> <\/i>To the contrary,<i> <\/i>Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. famously wrote in the 1920 case of <b><i><a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/\" rel=\"noopener\">Missouri v. Holland<\/a><\/i><\/b> &#8220;that when we are dealing with words that also are a constituent act, like the Constitution of the United States, we must realize that they have called into life a being the development of which could not have been foreseen completely by the most gifted of its begetters.&#8221;<\/p> <p>To be sure, in the <i>Holland<\/i><i> <\/i>case, Holmes was referring directly to the United States, not the Constitution itself, as alive, but six years earlier, in <b><i><a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/\" rel=\"noopener\">Gompers v. United States<\/a><\/i><\/b>,<b><i> <\/i><\/b>even Holmes called &#8220;the provisions of the Constitution . . . organic living institutions.&#8221;  Likewise, Justice Felix Frankfurter, concurring in the 1952 case of <b><i><a href=\"https:\/\/caselaw.findlaw.com\/\" rel=\"noopener\">Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson<\/a><\/i><\/b>, declared, &#8220;The <a name=\"SR;9117\"><\/a>Constitution, we cannot recall too often, is an <a name=\"SR;9125\"><\/a>organism.&#8221; <\/p> <p>Although there is thus a long tradition of speaking of the Constitution as alive, in recent years most academic and judicial citations of &#8220;the living Constitution&#8221; have been critical. The turning point appears to have come in 1976, when then-Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote an essay in the <i>Texas Law Review<\/i>. Rehnquist&#8217;s &#8220;The Notion of a Living Constitution&#8221; distinguished between Holmes&#8217;s idea that where the Constitution speaks in broad language, it leaves to future generations the role of filling in the details&#8211;which he thought universally acceptable&#8211;and a different usage of the term &#8220;living Constitution,&#8221; which calls for &#8220;the substitution of some other set of values for those which may be derived from the language and intent of the framers.&#8221;<\/p> <p>Hence, the late Justice Rehnquist, like Justice Scalia, appeared to use the term &#8220;living Constitution&#8221; as a foil for his own preferred methodology: originalism.<\/p> <p><b>The Unfair Critique of the Living Constitution<\/b><\/p> <p>If the &#8220;living Constitution&#8221; metaphor is understood in the way that Rehnquist and Scalia understand it, then it is easy to see why the metaphor&#8211;if taken as a jurisprudential roadmap&#8211;would be bad for democracy. When judges rely upon the Constitution itself to hold a legislative act invalid, they serve the higher law, duly adopted pursuant to the rigorous ratification process. However, when judges &#8220;substitute&#8221; their own values for the Constitution&#8217;s values, and then use those substituted values as the basis for invalidating legislative action, they illegitimately take important decisions away from the people&#8217;s elected representatives.<\/p> <p>Yet the foregoing is a valid critique only if champions of the living Constitution really think that they have a warrant to <u>substitute<\/u> their views for those of the Constitution. In fact, however, no serious judge, lawyer or academic argues for that.<\/p> <p>Originalists and living-Constitutionalists both agree that where the constitutional text is clear, it controls. For example, Article II states that no person under the age of 35 can be President, and no champion of the living Constitution would argue that nonetheless an especially precocious 32-year-old should be deemed Presidency-eligible simply because she dislikes the textual limit.<\/p> <p>Originalists and living-Constitutionalists part ways over how to interpret <u>ambiguous<\/u> provisions of the constitutional text. Originalists say that judges should resolve textual ambiguity by consulting the prevailing views of the Founding generation. (I explored the relation between this formulation of originalism and the more traditional focus on &#8220;framers&#8217; intent&#8221; in <b><a href=\"\/legal-commentary\/harry-potter-and-the-framers-intent.html\">an earlier column<\/a><\/b>, but we can put aside these nuances here.) The act of ratification by that earlier generation of Americans gave the text its power as law, and therefore, that earlier generation&#8217;s understanding should prevail, originalists say.<\/p> <p>By contrast, living-Constitutionalists believe that while the original understanding has some bearing on the Constitution&#8217;s contemporary meaning, it is not the whole story. For living Constitutionalists, the act of ratification by people who are long dead, and whose numbers did not include any women or enslaved African-Americans, does not suffice to make the Constitution effective today. For us living-Constitutionalists, the Constitution&#8217;s current authority derives at least in substantial part from the fact that we the living people accept it as authoritative. And if our acceptance validates the Constitution, then, as Justice Powell said in the <i>Rummel <\/i>case, the way in which contemporary Americans understand the Constitution&#8217;s language should play a substantial role in how the courts interpret that language.<\/p> <p>Understood in this way, the notion of a living Constitution is simply an effort to interpret the Constitution, not to replace it. Justice Scalia and others may still have reasons to prefer the dead to the living Constitution, but their core claim&#8211;that the dead Constitution is the <u>real<\/u> Constitution&#8211;proves, upon inspection, to be nothing more than an assertion of the power of the dead few to rule the living many from the grave.<\/p> <p>In his 1976 essay, Justice Rehnquist charmingly admitted that it would be difficult to market anything called the &#8220;dead Constitution.&#8221; The problem, it turns out, is not just a matter of marketing, but the product itself. The dead Constitution is dead. Long live the living Constitution.<\/p>\n\n\n<\/span>\n\n\n\n<hr size=\"1\">\n<p class=\"authorfoot\">\n\n<!-- BEGIN AUTHORS FOOTNOTE -->\n<a name=\"bio\"><\/a>\nMichael C. Dorf is the Isidor &amp; Seville Sulzbacher Professor of Law at Columbia University. He is the author of <i>No Litmus Test: Law Versus Politics in the Twenty-First Century<\/i> and he blogs at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.michaeldorf.org\/\" rel=\"noopener\">michaeldorf.org<\/a>.\n<br><br>\n\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n    <\/div><div class=\"was-this-helpful\">\n    <div\n            class=\"was-this-helpful__question-container\"\n            aria-labelledby=\"was-this-helpful__question\"\n            role=\"group\"\n    >\n        <span\n                id=\"was-this-helpful__question\"\n                class=\"was-this-helpful__question fl-text-lg-bold\"\n        >Was this helpful?<\/span>\n        <button\n                class=\"was-this-helpful__button fl-text-sm\"\n                aria-label=\"Yes\"\n                value=\"yes\"\n        >\n            <span class=\"was-this-helpful__button-text fl-text-bold\">Yes<\/span>\n            <i class=\"was-this-helpful__button-icon\">\n                <svg width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"none\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\">\n                    <g id=\"thumbs-up\" clip-path=\"url(#clip0_604_3418)\">\n                        <path id=\"Vector\"\n                              d=\"M6 21H3C2.46957 21 1.96086 20.7893 1.58579 20.4142C1.21071 20.0391 1 19.5304 1 19V12C1 11.4696 1.21071 10.9609 1.58579 10.5858C1.96086 10.2107 2.46957 10 3 10H6M13 8V4C13 3.20435 12.6839 2.44129 12.1213 1.87868C11.5587 1.31607 10.7956 1 10 1L6 10V21H17.28C17.7623 21.0055 18.2304 20.8364 18.5979 20.524C18.9654 20.2116 19.2077 19.7769 19.28 19.3L20.66 10.3C20.7035 10.0134 20.6842 9.72068 20.6033 9.44225C20.5225 9.16382 20.3821 8.90629 20.1919 8.68751C20.0016 8.46873 19.7661 8.29393 19.5016 8.17522C19.2371 8.0565 18.9499 7.99672 18.66 8H13Z\"\n                              stroke=\"#666666\" stroke-width=\"2\" stroke-linecap=\"round\"\n                              stroke-linejoin=\"round\"><\/path>\n                    <\/g>\n                    <defs>\n                        <clipPath id=\"clip0_604_3418\">\n                            <rect width=\"22\" height=\"22\" fill=\"white\"><\/rect>\n                        <\/clipPath>\n                    <\/defs>\n                <\/svg>\n            <\/i>\n        <\/button>\n        <button\n                class=\"was-this-helpful__button fl-text-sm\"\n                aria-label=\"No\"\n                value=\"no\"\n        >\n            <span class=\"was-this-helpful__button-text fl-text-bold\">No<\/span>\n            <i class=\"was-this-helpful__button-icon\">\n                <svg width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"none\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\">\n                    <g id=\"thumbs-down\" clip-path=\"url(#clip0_604_3423)\">\n                        <path id=\"Vector\"\n                              d=\"M16 0.999995H18.67C19.236 0.989986 19.7859 1.18813 20.2154 1.55681C20.645 1.9255 20.9242 2.43905 21 3V10C20.9242 10.5609 20.645 11.0745 20.2154 11.4432C19.7859 11.8119 19.236 12.01 18.67 12H16M9.00003 14V18C9.00003 18.7956 9.3161 19.5587 9.87871 20.1213C10.4413 20.6839 11.2044 21 12 21L16 12V0.999995H4.72003C4.2377 0.994543 3.76965 1.16359 3.40212 1.47599C3.0346 1.78839 2.79235 2.22309 2.72003 2.7L1.34003 11.7C1.29652 11.9866 1.31586 12.2793 1.39669 12.5577C1.47753 12.8362 1.61793 13.0937 1.80817 13.3125C1.99842 13.5313 2.23395 13.7061 2.49846 13.8248C2.76297 13.9435 3.05012 14.0033 3.34003 14H9.00003Z\"\n                              stroke=\"#666666\" stroke-width=\"2\" stroke-linecap=\"round\" stroke-linejoin=\"round\"\/>\n                    <\/g>\n                    <defs>\n                        <clipPath id=\"clip0_604_3423\">\n                            <rect width=\"22\" height=\"22\" fill=\"white\"\/>\n                        <\/clipPath>\n                    <\/defs>\n                <\/svg>\n            <\/i>\n        <\/button>\n    <\/div>\n    <span class=\"was-this-helpful__taken-action fl-text-sm-bold\"><\/span>\n    <div class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-container\">\n        <div class=\"was-this-helpful__choose-option-message\" role=\"status\">\n            <p class=\"was-this-helpful__choose-option-message-text\"><\/p>\n        <\/div>\n        <form class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-form\">\n            <div class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback was-this-helpful__feedback--positive\">\n                <fieldset>\n                    <legend class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\" tabindex=\"0\">Why was this helpful?<\/legend>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--understandable\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"positive-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Easy to understand\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--understandable\"\n                        >Easy to understand<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--solved-problem\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"positive-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Solved my problem\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--solved-problem\"\n                        >Solved my problem<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--other\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"positive-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Other\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--other\"\n                        >Other<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                <\/fieldset>\n            <\/div>\n            <div class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback was-this-helpful__feedback--negative\">\n                <fieldset>\n                    <legend class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\" tabindex=\"0\">Why was this not helpful?<\/legend>\n                    <div class=\"was-this-helpful__choose-option-message\" role=\"status\">\n                        <p class=\"was-this-helpful__choose-option-message-text\"><\/p>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--missing-info\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"negative-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Missing Information\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--missing-info\"\n                        >Missing the information I need<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--complicated\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"negative-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Too complicated\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--complicated\"\n                        >Too complicated \/ too many steps<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--dated\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"negative-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Out of date\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--dated\"\n                        >Out of date<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                    <div class=\"fl-radio-button-field fl-flex was-this-helpful__feedback-form-title\">\n                        <input\n                                id=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--negative-other\"\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-input\"\n                                type=\"radio\"\n                                name=\"negative-feedback\"\n                                value=\"Other\"\n                        >\n                        <label\n                                class=\"fl-radio-button-field-label fl-text-sm was-this-helpful__radio-label\"\n                                for=\"was-this-helpful__radio-button--negative-other\"\n                        >Other<\/label>\n                    <\/div>\n                <\/fieldset>\n            <\/div>\n            <div class=\"was-this-helpful__form-buttons-container\">\n                <button\n                    class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-button was-this-helpful__feedback-button--positive at-feedback-submit fl-button secondary\"\n                    type=\"submit\"\n                >\n                    <span class=\"fl-button-content\">Submit<\/span>\n                    <i\n                        class=\"fa fa-angle-right medium\"\n                        aria-hidden=\"true\"\n                    ><\/i>\n                <\/button>\n                <button\n                    class=\"was-this-helpful__feedback-button was-this-helpful__feedback-button--cancel fl-button primary disabled\"\n                    type=\"reset\"\n                >\n                    <span class=\"fl-button-content\">Cancel<\/span>\n                    <i\n                        class=\"fa fa-times-circle medium\"\n                        aria-hidden=\"true\"\n                    ><\/i>\n                <\/button>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/form>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"was-this-helpful__thank-you-message\" role=\"status\">\n        <i class=\"was-this-helpful__thank-you-message-icon fa fa-check\"><\/i>\n        <p class=\"was-this-helpful__thank-you-message-text\" aria-live=\"polite\"><\/p>\n    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n    <\/div>\n    \n    <div class=\"fl-block-column fl-section-sidebar\">\n        \n    <\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"parent":49876,"menu_order":0,"template":"app\/Http\/Controllers\/Templates\/ArticlePageController.php","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_stopmodifiedupdate":false,"_modified_date":"","_cloudinary_featured_overwrite":false},"class_list":["post-54476","supreme","type-supreme","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/supreme.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/supreme\/54476","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/supreme.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/supreme"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/supreme.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/supreme"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/supreme.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/supreme\/49876"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/supreme.findlaw.com\/legal-api\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54476"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}