US Supreme Court Docket
[Click here for 2002 Docket]
Household Credit Services, Inc. v. Sharon R. Pfennig
No. 02-857
Subject:
-
Truth in Lending Act ("TILA"), Banking, Credit Card Fees
-
Whether the Federal Reserve Board reasonably classified a fee imposed
by a credit card lender because a consumer has exceeded the credit limit
as one of the "other charges which may be imposed" under the account
(15 U.S.C. 1637(a)(5)) rather than as a "finance charge" (15 U.S.C. 1605(a)), within the meaning of the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. 1601
et seq.
- U.S. Court of Appeals - 6th Circuit, Filed: April 11, 2002
- United States Supreme Court, Cert. Granted: June 27, 2003
- United States Supreme Court, Decided: April 21, 2004
Resources:
- Docket Sheet From the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Oral Argument Transcript
- Northwestern University - Medill School of Journalism: On the Docket
Briefs:
-
Parties
- Respondent - Opposition (Petition) [PDF] (2.6 MB)
- Petitioners (Merits) [PDF]
- Respondent (Merits) [PDF] (1.4 MB)
- Petitioners - Reply (Merits) [PDF]
Amicus - Petitioners - United States (Petition) [PDF] [RTF] [TEXT]
- William P. Schlenk (Merits) [PDF]
- United States (Merits) [PDF] [TEXT]
Randall C. Scarborough v. Anthony Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
No. 02-1657
Subject:
-
Equal Access to Justice Act, Attorney Fees, Jurisdiction
-
Whether, or in what circumstances, an applicant for attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act is barred from obtaining a fee award by the Act's 30-day statute of limitations solely because the applicant's timely-filed fee application did not initially allege that the position of the government in the underlying litigation lacked substantial justification.
- U.S. Court of Appeals - Federal Circuit, Filed: February 13, 2003
- United States Supreme Court, Cert. Granted: September 30, 2003
Resources:
- Docket Sheet From the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Oral Argument Transcript
- Northwestern University - Medill School of Journalism: On the Docket
Briefs:
-
Parties
- Petitioner (Petition) [PDF]
- Respondent - Opposition (Petition) [PDF] [TEXT]
- Petitioner (Merits) [PDF]
- Respondent (Merits) [PDF] [TEXT]
Tuesday, February 24
Edith Jones, et al., etc. v. R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co.
No. 02-1205
Subject:
-
Racial Discrimination, Wrongful Termination, Statutes of Limitations
-
Does the four-year "catch-all" limitations period of 28
U.S.C. 1658 apply to new causes of action created by Public
Law 102-166, 105 Stat. 1071, the Civil Rights Act of 1991,
which were codified at 42 U.S.C. 1981(a) and (b)?
- U.S. Court of Appeals - 7th Circuit [PDF], Filed: September 16, 2002
- United States Supreme Court, Cert. Granted: May 19, 2003
Resources:
- Docket Sheet From the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Oral Argument Transcript
- Northwestern University - Medill School of Journalism: On the Docket
Briefs:
Jeffrey Beard, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al. v. George E. Banks
No. 02-1603
Subject:
-
Habeas Corpus, Retroactivity, Death Penalty, Mitigating Evidence, Criminal Law
- Does this Court's decision in Mills v. Maryland, 486 U.S. 367 (1988) create a new rule of law that cannot be applied retroactively to award sentencing relief to a prisoner whose conviction became final before Mills was announced?
- If Mills applies retroactively, where a state supreme court has rejected a Mills challenge because neither the trial court's instructions nor the verdict form advised the jury that it must be unanimous as to the existence of mitigating circumstances and, to the contrary, made clear that unanimity was required only to find aggravating circumstances and to impose a sentence of death, is that decision a reasonable application of this Court's precedent?
- U.S. Court of Appeals - 3rd Circuit, Filed: January 14, 2003
- United States Supreme Court, Cert. Granted: September 30, 2003
Resources:
- Docket Sheet From the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Oral Argument Transcript
- Northwestern University - Medill School of Journalism: On the Docket
Briefs:
-
Parties
- Petitioners (Petition} [PDF] (3.4 MB)
- Petitioners (Merits} [PDF]
- Respondent (Merits} [PDF]
- Petitioners - Reply (Merits} [PDF]
Amicus - Petitioners - Criminal Justice Legal Foundation (Petition) [PDF]
Wednesday, February 25
United States v. Manuel Flores-Montano
No. 02-1794
Subject:
-
Fourth Amendment, Search and Seizure, Reasonable Suspicion, Criminal Law
-
Whether, under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution,
customs officers at the international border must have reasonable suspicion
to remove, disassemble, and search a vehicle's fuel tank for contraband.
- U.S. District Ct. - Southern Dist. of Cal., Order Suppressing Evidence, Filed: June 20, 2002
- U.S. Court of Appeals - 9th Circuit (Case No. 02-50306), Unpublished Order Affirming District Ct., Filed: March 14, 2003
- United States Supreme Court, Cert. Granted: October 14, 2003
- United States Supreme Court, Decided: March 30, 2004
Resources:
- Docket Sheet From the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Oral Argument Transcript
- Northwestern University - Medill School of Journalism: On the Docket
Briefs:
-
Parties
- Petitioner (Petition) [PDF] [TEXT]
- Petitioner - Reply (Petition) [PDF] [TEXT]
- Petitioner (Merits) [PDF] [TEXT]
- Respondent (Merits) [PDF] [TEXT]
- Petitioner - Reply (Merits) [PDF] [TEXT]
Republic of Austria, et al. v. Maria V. Altmann
No. 03-13
Subject:
-
Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976, foreign states, Jurisdiction, Wrongful Appropriation, International Law
-
Does the expropriation exception of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 ("FSIA"), 28 U.S.C. 1605(a)(3), afford jurisdiction over claims against foreign states based on conduct that occurred before the United States adopted the restrictive theory of sovereign immunity in 1952?
- U.S. Court of Appeals - 9th Circuit, Filed: December 2, 2002
- United States Supreme Court, Cert. Granted: September 30, 2003
Resources:
- Docket Sheet From the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Oral Argument Transcript
- Northwestern University - Medill School of Journalism: On the Docket
Briefs:
-
Parties
- Petitioners (Petition) [PDF] (4.7 MB)
- Petitioners (Merits) [PDF]
- Respondent (Merits) [PDF]
- Petitioners - Reply (Merits) [PDF]
To view PDF files listed on this page you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader