US Supreme Court Docket

Supreme Court Docket

Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | Unscheduled | Previous Terms
[Download February 8, 2007 Argument Calendar PDF]
[Click here for 2005 Docket]
Many documents listed on this page are PDF files that may be viewed using AdobeReader.

Microsoft Corporation v. AT&T Corporation
No. 05-1056 Title:

Microsoft Corporation v. AT&T Corp.

Subject:

Patent Infringement, 35 U.S.C. section 271(f)(1), Intellectual Property, Cyberlaw, International Trade

Question:

Title 35 U.S.C. section 271(f)(1) provides that it is an act of direct patent infringement to "suppl[y]... from the United States ... components of a patented invention ... in such manner as to actively induce the combination of such components outside of the United States." In this case, AT&T Corp. alleges that when Microsoft Corporation's Windows software is installed on a personal computer, the programmed computer infringes AT&T's patent for a "Digital Speech Coder" system. AT&T sought damages not only for each Windows-based computer made or sold in the United States, but also, under Section 271(f)(1), for each computer made and sold abroad. Extending Section 271(f)and consequently, the extraterritorial application of U.S. patent lawthe Federal Circuit held that Microsoft infringed under Section 271(f)(1) when it exported master versions of its Windows software code to foreign computer manufacturers, who then copied the software code and installed the duplicate versions on foreign-manufactured computers that were sold only to foreign consumers. The questions presented are:


1. Whether digital software codean intangible sequence of "1's" and "0's"may be considered a "component[] of a patented invention" within the meaning of Section 271(f)(1); and, if so,
2. Whether copies of such a "component[]" made in a foreign country are "supplie [d] . . . from the United States."

Decisions:

• U.S. Court of Appeals - Federal Circuit Opinion Filed: July 13, 2005
• United States Supreme Court, Cert. Granted: October 27, 2006

Resources:

• Docket Sheet From the U.S. Supreme Court.
• Northwestern University - Medill School of Journalism: On the Docket

Briefs:

    Parties

Coming Soon

Counsel of Record

For Petitioner Microsoft Corp.:

Theodore B. Olson
Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Washington, DC

For Respondent AT&T Corp.:

Seth P. Waxman
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, LLP
Washington, DC

Stephen C. Neal
Cooley Godward LLP
Palo Alto, CA 94306

 

Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | Unscheduled | Previous Terms

 

To view PDF files listed on this page you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader