US Supreme Court Docket
Supreme Court Docket
Oct
| Nov
| Dec
| Jan
| Feb
| Mar
| Apr
| Unscheduled
| Previous Terms
[Download January 8, 2007 Argument Calendar PDF]
[Download February Argument Calendar - Coming Soon]
[Click here for 2005 Docket]
Many documents listed on this page are PDF files
that may be viewed using AdobeReader.
Travelers Casualty and Surety Co. v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company
No. 05-1429
Title:
Parties
For Petitioner Travelers Cas. & Surety Co.:
Oct
| Nov
| Dec
| Jan
| Feb
| Mar
| Apr
| Unscheduled
| Previous Terms
[Download February Argument Calendar - Coming Soon]
[Click here for 2005 Docket]
Many documents listed on this page are PDF files

No. 05-1429
- Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Subject:
-
Attorney's Fees, Contracts, Bankruptcy Law
-
Petitioner and Respondent entered into a contract that included a provision that
Petitioner is entitled to recover its attorneys' fees incurred in connection with the
enforcement, protection, or litigation of its contractual and legal rights. Petitioner
incurred attorneys' fees litigating its rights during the course of Respondent's
bankruptcy case and sought to recover them from Respondent. Adhering to its prior
decision in Fobian v. Western Farm Credit Bank (In re Fobian), 951 F.2d 1149 (9th
Cir. 1991), the Ninth Circuit held that Petitioner could not recover its attorneys' fees
because the relevant litigation in the bankruptcy court involved issues of federal
bankruptcy law. The court reasoned that, as a matter of general federal common
law, a party may not recover its attorneys' fees pursuant to a contract or state
statute where the issues litigated involve matters of federal law because only
federal law may authorize such a recovery. The question presented is:
Should the Court grant certiorari to resolve a conflict among nine courts of appeals concerning whether a litigant may recover attorneys' fees under a contract or state statute where the issues litigated involve matters of federal bankruptcy law?
- United States Supreme Court, Cert. Granted: October 6, 2006
Resources:
- Docket Sheet From the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Northwestern University - Medill School of Journalism: On the Docket
Parties
-
Petition Phase
- Certiorari Petition
- Reply to Brief in Opposition
Merits Phase
- Petitioner's Brief
- Respondent's Brief
- Petitioner's Reply Brief
For Petitioner Travelers Cas. & Surety Co.:
G. Eric Brunstad Jr.For Respondent PG&E:
Bingham McCutchen, LLP
Hartford, CT
Gary M. Kaplan
Howard Rice Nemerowski Canady Falk & Rabkin
San Francisco, CA
To view PDF files listed on this page you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader

Was this helpful?