US Supreme Court Docket
Supreme Court Docket
Oct
| Nov
| Dec
| Jan
| Feb
| Mar
| Apr
| Unscheduled
| Previous Terms
[Download February 8, 2007 Argument Calendar PDF]
[Click here for 2005 Docket]
Many documents listed on this page are PDF files
that may be viewed using AdobeReader.
Fry v. Pliler
No. 06-5247
Title:
Parties
For Petitioner:
Oct
| Nov
| Dec
| Jan
| Feb
| Mar
| Apr
| Unscheduled
| Previous Terms
[Click here for 2005 Docket]
Many documents listed on this page are PDF files
that may be viewed using AdobeReader.
No. 06-5247
-
John Francis Fry v. Cheryl K. Pliler, Warden
Subject:
-
Habeas Corpus, Harmless Error, Chapman v. California, Brecht v. Abrahamson, Burden of Proof
- If constitutional error in a state trial is not recognized by the judiciary until the
case ends up in federal court under 28 U.S.C. section 2254, is the prejudicial impact of
the error assessed under the standard set forth in Chapman v. California, 386 U.S.
18 (1967), or that enunciated in Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619 (1993)? Does
it matter which harmless error standard is employed? And, if the Brecht standard
applies, does the petitioner or the State bear the burden of persuasion on the
question of prejudice?
- United States Supreme Court, Cert. Granted: December 7, 2006
Resources:
- Docket Sheet From the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Northwestern University - Medill School of Journalism: On the Docket
Parties
-
Coming Soon
For Petitioner:
Victor S. HaltomFor Respondent:
Sacramento, CA
Ross C. Moody
CA Dept. of Justice, Attorney General
San Francisco, CA
To view PDF files listed on this page you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader
Was this helpful?