US Supreme Court Docket
Supreme Court Docket
Oct
| Nov
| Dec
| Jan
| Feb
| Mar
| Apr
| Unscheduled
| Previous Terms
[Download October 2, 2006 Argument Calendar PDF]
[Download October 30, 2006 Argument Calendar PDF]
[Click here for 2005 Docket]
Many documents listed on this page are PDF files
that may be viewed using AdobeReader.
Carey v. Musladin
No. 05-785
Title:
Parties
For Petitioner Thomas L. Carey, Warden:
Oct
| Nov
| Dec
| Jan
| Feb
| Mar
| Apr
| Unscheduled
| Previous Terms
[Download October 30, 2006 Argument Calendar PDF]
[Click here for 2005 Docket]
Many documents listed on this page are PDF files

No. 05-785
-
Thomas L. Carey, Warden v. Mathew Musladin
Subject:
-
Due Process, Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, Criminal Law, Habeas Corpus
-
In the absence of controlling Supreme Court law, did the Court of Appeals for the
Ninth Circuit exceed its authority under 28 U.S.C. section 2254(d)(1) by overturning
respondent's state conviction of murder on the ground that the Courtroom
spectators included three family members of the victim who wore buttons depicting
the deceased?
- U.S. Court of Appeals - 9th Circuit
Opinion Filed: April 8, 2005
- United States Supreme Court, Cert. Granted: April 17, 2006
- United States Supreme Court, Decided: December 11, 2006
Resources:
- Docket Sheet From the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Northwestern University - Medill School of Journalism: On the Docket
Parties
-
Merits Phase
- Brief of Petitioner Carey
- Brief of Respondent Musladin
- Amicus Brief of the NACDL in Support of Respondent
- Amicus Brief of the CJLF in Support of Petitioner
For Petitioner Thomas L. Carey, Warden:
Gregory A. OttFor Respondent Mathew Musladin:
State of California Attorney General Office
San Francisco, CA
David Wayne Fermino
Federal Public Defender Northern Dist. of CA
San Francisco, CA
To view PDF files listed on this page you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader

Was this helpful?