US Supreme Court Docket
Supreme Court Docket
Oct
| Nov
| Dec
| Jan
| Feb
| Mar
| Apr
| Unscheduled
| Previous Terms
[Download October 2, 2006 Argument Calendar PDF]
[Download October 30, 2006 Argument Calendar PDF]
[Click here for 2005 Docket]
Many documents listed on this page are PDF files
that may be viewed using AdobeReader.
Lawrence v. Florida
No. 05-8820
Title:
Parties
For Petitioner Gary Lawrence:
Oct
| Nov
| Dec
| Jan
| Feb
| Mar
| Apr
| Unscheduled
| Previous Terms
[Download October 30, 2006 Argument Calendar PDF]
[Click here for 2005 Docket]
Many documents listed on this page are PDF files

No. 05-8820
-
Gary Lawrence v. Florida
Subject:
-
Capital Cases, Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), Statute of Limitations, Equitable Tolling, Extraordinary Circumstances
- There is a split in the circuits about whether the one-year period of
limitations is tolled for "[t]he time during which a properly filed application
for State post-conviction or other collateral review with respect to the
pertinent judgment of claim is pending . . . . " Antiterrorism and Effective
Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) 28 U.S.C. Section 2244(d) (2). Where a
defendant facing death has pending a United States Supreme Court certiorari
petition to review the validity of the state's denial of his claims for state postconviction
relief, does the defendant have an application pending which tolls
the 2244 (d)(2) statute of limitations?
- Alternatively, does the confusion around the statute of limitations --as
evidenced by the split in the circuits -constitute an "extraordinary
circumstance," entitling the diligent defendant to equitable tolling during the
time when his claim is being considered by the United States Supreme Court
on certiorari?
- And in the second alternative, do the special circumstance where counsel advising the defendant as to the statute of limitations was registry counsel - a species of state actor - under the monitoring supervision of Florida Courts, with a statutory duty to file appropriate motions in a timely manner, constitute an "extraordinary circumstance" beyond the defendant's control such that the doctrine of equitable tolling should operate to save his petition?
- U.S. Court of Appeals - 11th Circuit
Opinion Filed: August 26, 2005
- United States Supreme Court, Cert. Granted: March 27, 2006
- Supreme Court of Florida, Per Curiam Opinion Filed: October 17, 2002
Resources:
- Docket Sheet From the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Northwestern University - Medill School of Journalism: On the Docket
Parties
-
Petition Phase
- Petition for a Writ of Certiorari
Merits Phase
- Brief for Petitioner - Coming Soon
- Brief for Respondent - Coming Soon
- Amicus Brief of the ACLU
- Amicus Brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
For Petitioner Gary Lawrence:
Mary Catherine BonnerFor Respondent Florida:
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Cassandra K. Dolgin
Assistant Attorney General
Tallahassee, FL
To view PDF files listed on this page you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader

Was this helpful?