Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

US Supreme Court Docket

Supreme Court Docket

Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | Unscheduled | Previous Terms


[Download October 1, 2007 Argument Calendar PDF]
[Click here for 2006 Docket]
Many documents listed on this page are PDF files that may be viewed using AdobeReader.

Washington State Grange v. Wa. State Republican Party
No. 06-713
Title:
    Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party, et al.

Subject:

    Election Law, Government Law, Party Primaries, First Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment
Question:
    In California Democratic Party v. Jones, 530 U.S. 567, 585-586 (2000), this Court specified how States could structure a top-two primary system that does not violate the associational rights of a political party. Pursuant to the Initiative power which the People of the State of Washington reserved to themselves in their State Constitution, the voters of the State of Washington enacted a top-two primary law that the Washington State Grange had drafted to comply with Jones. That law makes the State primary a contest to select the two most popular candidates for the November ballot - regardless of party nominations or party selection. That law also allows candidates for certain offices to disclose on the ballot the name of the party (if any) which that candidate personally prefers.

    The Ninth Circuit invalidated this top-two primary system in its entirety, holding that the First Amendment (applied to the States through the 14th Amendment) prohibits a State from so allowing a candidate to disclose the name of the party he or she personally prefers on the ballot.

    Does the First Amendment prohibit top-two election systems that allow a candidate to disclose on the ballot the name of the party he or she personally prefers?
Decisions:

Resources:

  • Docket Sheet From the U.S. Supreme Court.
  • Northwestern University - Medill School of Journalism: On the Docket -- Coming Soon
Briefs:

    Parties
    Coming Soon
Counsel of Record

For Petitioner:
Thomas Fitzgerald Ahearne
Seattle, WA
For Respondent:
David T. McDonald
Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP
Seattle, WA


 

Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | Unscheduled | Previous Terms

 

To view PDF files listed on this page you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader


Was this helpful?

Copied to clipboard