Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

US Supreme Court Docket

Supreme Court Docket

Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | Unscheduled | Previous Terms

[Download November 3, 2008 Argument Calendar PDF]
[Click here for 2007 Docket]

Many documents listed on this page are PDF files that may be viewed using AdobeReader.

US v. Eurodif S.A.
No. 07-1059 and 07-1078


    United States v. Eurodif S.A., et al. (07-1059)

    USEC Inc., et al. v. Eurodif S.A., et al. (07-1078)


    19 U.S.C. 1673, Tariff Act of 1930, Antidumping Duties, Imports, Manufacturing


    Section 1673 of Title 19 of the United States Code provides that, when "a class or kind of foreign merchandise is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than its fair value," to the detriment of a domestic industry, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) shall impose antidumping duties on entries of the foreign merchandise. The question presented is:

    Whether the court of appeals erred in rejecting Commerce's conclusion that foreign merchandise is "sold in the United States" within the meaning of 19 U.S.C. 1673 when a purchaser in the United States obtains foreign merchandise by providing monetary payments and raw materials to a foreign entity that performs a major manufacturing process in which substantial value is added to the raw materials, thereby creating a new and different article of merchandise that is delivered to the U.S. purchaser.



  • Docket Sheet From the U.S. Supreme Court.


    Coming Soon
Counsel of Record

For Petitioner:

Gregory G. Garre
Solicitor General
United States Department of Justice
Washington, DC

For Respondent:

Nancy A. Fischer
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Washington, DC


Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | Unscheduled | Previous Terms


To view PDF files listed on this page you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader

Was this helpful?

Response sent, thank you

Copied to clipboard