US Supreme Court Docket
Oregon v. Thomas Eugene Ice
Whether the Sixth Amendment, as construed in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004), requires that facts (other than prior convictions) necessary to imposing consecutive sentences be found by the jury or admitted by the defendant.
- Supreme Court of Oregon Opinion Filed: October 11, 2007
- United States Supreme Court Cert. Granted: March 17, 2008
- Docket Sheet From the U.S. Supreme Court.
Ernest G. Lannet
Office of Public Defense Services
To view PDF files listed on this page you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader