Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

US Supreme Court Docket

Supreme Court Docket

[Download January 12, 2008 Argument Calendar PDF]

Many documents listed on this page are PDF files that may be viewed using AdobeReader.

Horne v. Flores
No. 08-289


    Thomas C. Horne, Superintendent, Arizona Public Instruction v. Miriam Flores, et al.


    Education Law, Statutory Interpretation


    1. By interpreting the phrase "appropriate action" under Section 1703(f) of the Equal
    Education Opportunity Act as a requirement that the State of Arizona provide for a
    minimum amount of funding specifically allocated for English Language Learner
    programs statewide, did the Ninth Circuit violate the doctrine prohibiting federal
    courts from usurping the discretionary power of state governments to determine
    how to appropriately manage and fund their public education systems?

    2. Should the phrase "appropriate action" as used in Section 1703(f) of the Equal
    Education Opportunity Act be interpreted consistently with the No Child Left Behind
    Act of 2001, where both Acts have the same purpose with respect to English
    Language Learners and the NCLB provides specific standards for the
    implementation of adequate English Language Learner programs, but the EEOA
    does not?



  • Docket Sheet From the U.S. Supreme Court.


    Coming Soon
Counsel of Record

For Petitioner:

Eric J. Bistrow
Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.
Phoenix, AZ

For Respondent:

Kimberly Anne Demarchi
Lewis & Roca LLP
Phoenix, AZ


Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | Unscheduled | Previous Terms


To view PDF files listed on this page you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader

Was this helpful?

Response sent, thank you

Copied to clipboard