Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

US Supreme Court Docket

Supreme Court Docket

Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | Unscheduled | Previous Terms



[Download November 30, 2009 Argument Calendar PDF]
[Click here for 2008 Docket]

Many documents listed on this page are PDF files that may be viewed using AdobeReader.


Free Enterprise Fund v. Pub. Co. Acctg. Oversight Bd.
No. 08-861


    Free Enterprise Fund v. Pub. Co. Acctg. Oversight Bd.


    Securities Law, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law


    1. Whether the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 violates the Constitution's separation of powers by vesting members of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB") with far-reaching executive power while completely stripping the President of all authority to appoint or remove those members or otherwise supervise or control their exercise of that power, or whether, as the court of appeals held, the Act is constitutional because Congress can restrict the President's removal authority in any way it "deems best for the public interest."

    2. Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that, under the Appointments Clause, PCAOB members are "inferior officers" directed and supervised by the
    Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), where the SEC lacks any authority to supervise those members personally, to remove the members for any policyrelated reason or to influence the members' key investigative functions, merely because the SEC may review some of the members' work product.

    3. If PCAOB members are inferior officers, whether the Act's provision for their appointment by the SEC violates the Appointments Clause either because the SEC is not a "Department" under Freytag v. Commissioner, 501 U.S. 868 (1991), or because the five commissioners, acting collectively, are not the "Head" of the SEC.




  • U.S. Court of Appeals - D.C. Circuit, Opinion Filed: August 22, 2008




  • Docket Sheet From the U.S. Supreme Court.



Counsel of Record

For Petitioner:

Michael A. Carvin
Jones Day
Washington, DC

For Respondent:

Elena Kagan
Solicitor General
United States Department of Justice
Washington, DC



Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | Unscheduled | Previous Terms


To view PDF files listed on this page you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader

Was this helpful?

Copied to clipboard