Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

US Supreme Court Docket

Supreme Court Docket

Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | Unscheduled | Previous Terms

[Download November 2, 2009 Argument Calendar PDF]
[Click here for 2008 Docket]

Many documents listed on this page are PDF files that may be viewed using AdobeReader.

Beard v. Kindler
No. 08-992


    Beard v. Kindler


    Habeas Corpus, Constitutional Law


    After murdering a witness against him and receiving a sentence of death, respondent broke out of prison, twice. Prior to his recapture in Canada years later, the trial court exercised its discretion under state forfeiture law to dismiss respondent's post-verdict motions, resulting in default of most appellate claims. On federal habeas corpus review, the court of appeals refused to honor the state court's procedural bar, ruling that, because "the state court ... had discretion" in applying the rule, it was not "firmly established" and was therefore "inadequate." Is a state procedural rule automatically inadequate under the adequate-state grounds doctrine - and therefore unenforceable on federal habeas corpus review - because the state rule is discretionary rather than mandatory?



  • Docket Sheet From the U.S. Supreme Court.


    Coming Soon
Counsel of Record

For Petitioner:

Ronald Eisenberg
Deputy District Attorney
Philadelphia, PA

For Respondent:

Matthew C. Lawry
Defender Association of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, PA


Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | Unscheduled | Previous Terms


To view PDF files listed on this page you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader

Was this helpful?

Copied to clipboard