Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

US Supreme Court Docket

Supreme Court Docket

Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | Unscheduled | Previous Terms

[Download November 2, 2009 Argument Calendar PDF]
[Click here for 2008 Docket]

Many documents listed on this page are PDF files that may be viewed using AdobeReader.

Wood v. Allen
No. 08-9156


    Wood v. Allen


    Death Penalty, Criminal Law and Procedure


    1. Whether a state court's decision on post-conviction review is based on an unreasonable determination of the facts when it concludes that, during the sentencing phase of a capital case, the failure of a novice attorney with no criminal law experience to pursue or present evidence of defendant's severely impaired mental functioning was a strategic decision, while the court ignores evidence in the record before it that demonstrates otherwise?

    2. Whether the rule followed by some circuits, including the majority in this case, abdicates the court's judicial review function under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act by failing to determine whether a state court decision was unreasonable in light of the entire state court record and instead focusing solely on whether there is clear and convincing evidence in that record to rebut certain subsidiary factual findings?

    3. Whether a state court unreasonably applies Atkins v. Virginia when it bases its finding that a defendant does not have significant deficits in adaptive functioning and thus is not mentally retarded on an analysis of the defendant's relative strengths in adaptive functioning without considering the defendant's limitations, which is inconsistent with the accepted and established clinical definitions of mental retardation?

    4. Whether a petitioner seeking habeas relief in federal court may rely on a comparative juror analysis to demonstrate a Batson v. Kentucky violation where that analysis is based on facts from the state trial court record, but was not presented to the state trial court?



  • Docket Sheet From the U.S. Supreme Court.


    Coming Soon
Counsel of Record

For Petitioner:

Kerry Alan Scanlon
Kaye Scholer LLP
Washington, DC

For Respondent:

Corey L.. Maze
Solicitor General
Office of the Attorney General
Montgomery, AL


Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | Unscheduled | Previous Terms


To view PDF files listed on this page you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader

Was this helpful?

Copied to clipboard