Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

US Supreme Court Docket

Supreme Court Docket

[Download October 2009 Argument Calendar PDF]

Many documents listed on this page are PDF files that may be viewed using AdobeReader.

Alvarez v. Smith
No. 08-351


    Alvarez v. Smith


    Asset Forfeiture, Civil Procedure


    1. In determining whether the Due Process Clause requires a State or local government to provide a post-seizure probable cause hearing prior to a statutory judicial forfeiture proceeding and, if so, when such a hearing must take place, should district courts apply the "speedy trial" test employed in United States v. $8,850, 461 U.S. 555 (1983) and Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972) or the three-part due process analysis set forth in Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976)?

    2. In light of this Court's holding in Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-561 (1992), may a court of appeals order a district court to enter permanent injunctive relief enjoining the application of a State statute based simply upon Plaintiffs' allegations in a complaint, where the parties are not at issue as no answer was filed in the district court and no evidence was ever heard in that court?

Decision Below:


  • Docket Sheet from the U.S. Supreme Court.


    Coming Soon
Counsel of Record

For Petitioner:

Paul A. Castiglione
Assistant State's Attorney
Chicago, IL

For Respondent:

Thomas Peters
Chicago, IL


Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | Unscheduled | Previous Terms


To view PDF files listed on this page you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader

Was this helpful?

Copied to clipboard