Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

US Supreme Court Docket

Supreme Court Docket

[Download October 2009 Argument Calendar PDF]

Many documents listed on this page are PDF files that may be viewed using AdobeReader.

South Carolina v. North Carolina
No. 138, Orig.


    South Carolina v. North Carolina


    Civil Procedure, Public Utilities


    In an equitable apportionment action between two States brought under this Court's original jurisdiction, intervention by a non-state entity is proper only when the putative intervenor demonstrates (1) a "compelling interest in [its] own right," (2) "apart from [its] interest in a class with all other citizens and creatures of the state," (3) "which interest is not properly represented by the state." New Jersey v. New York, 345 U.S. 369, 373 (1953) (per curiam).

    The State of South Carolina excepts to the following conclusions of the Special Master:

    1. That intervention is proper regardless of whether the party States adequately represent the movant's interests, whenever the movant is the "instrumentality" authorized to engage in conduct alleged to harm the plaintiff State, has an "independent property interest" at issue in the action, or otherwise has a "direct stake" in the outcome of the action. See First Interim Report at 10-21.

    2. That the City of Charlotte, North Carolina, the Catawba River Water Supply Project, and Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC should be permitted to intervene in this original action. See First Interim Report at 21-32


  • Docket Sheet from the U.S. Supreme Court.


    Coming Soon
Counsel of Record

For Petitioner:

Robert D. Cook
Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Columbia, SC

For Respondent:

David C. Frederick
Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, P.L.C.
Washington, DC


Oct | Nov | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | Unscheduled | Previous Terms


To view PDF files listed on this page you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader

Was this helpful?

Copied to clipboard