(ORDER LIST: 538 U.S.)
MONDAY, MARCH 31, 2003
CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION02-1 PHILLIPS, THOMAS, ET AL. V. WA LEGAL FOUND., ET AL.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of Brown v. Legal Foundation of Washington, 538 U. S. ___ (2003).
ORDERS IN PENDING CASES02M77 CLARK, JOANNE V. HENNINGER, WILLIAM L., DEPUTY SHERIFF
02-473 UNITED STATES V. BANKS, LASHAWN L.
The motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari out-of-time is denied.
02-8863 JACOX, WILLIE C. V. ENGLAND, SEC. OF NAVY
The motion for appointment of counsel is granted and it is ordered that Randall J. Roske, Esquire, of Las Vegas, Nevada, is appointed to serve as counsel for the respondent in this case.
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until April 21, 2003, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
CERTIORARI DENIED02-359 HENRY, AUBREY E. V. JEFFERSON CTY., ETC., ET AL.
02-1112 EDWARD D. JONES & CO., ET AL. V. KLOSS, ALICE P.
The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
02-1136 BRECKENRIDGE, JOHN, ET UX. V. NationsBANK OF TX
The motion of Chamber of Commerce of the United States for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
02-8651 ROBINSON, JESSE V. KNIGHT, SUPT., MIAMI
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are denied, and the petitions for writs of certiorari are dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioners have repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioners unless the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) are paid and the petitions are submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.